[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Proposed changes could help those who live near Woodford Co. wind farms  

Credit:  By Cheryl Wolfe, www.pantagraph.com 29 January 2012 ~~

EUREKA – Some proposed changes to the Woodford County zoning code will help landowners who live near wind farms, but whose properties are not involved in the projects.

“We are trying to protect people who live in and among these (wind farms) without (the turbines) interfering in their daily life,” said Shannon Rocke, a member of the Conservation, Planning and Zoning Committee. “It’s about property rights. These (turbines) are going to be up for 30 years.”

CP&Z member Duane Kingdon agreed. “There comes a time when we need to update our ordinances,” Kingdon said. “We now have more knowledge and more experience about the health effects of wind farms.”

The proposals, which require approval of the county board, include increasing the distance between a turbine and any non-participating, habitable farm; banning a turbine that would produce more than 30 hours of annual shadow flicker at a house on non-participating property; and financial proof that the wind farm owner can complete the project.

The ZBA also would require a Woodford County bank to hold half of the money needed to decommission a wind farm, with the remainder held in a surety bond.

“The decommissioning would have a restricting effect on profitability and would inhibit the ability to site a wind farm in Woodford County,” said Andrew Downey of Streator, who described himself as a turbine host and a consultant for Invenergy Wind.

Dan Davidson, a county resident who favors wind development, accused members of the CP&Z of being “anti-wind.”

“This is the only opportunity of Woodford County getting more revenue,” Davidson said. “There is a lot of bias against wind farms on this committee.”

Source:  By Cheryl Wolfe, www.pantagraph.com 29 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter