[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Proposed changes could help those who live near Woodford Co. wind farms 

Credit:  By Cheryl Wolfe, www.pantagraph.com 29 January 2012 ~~

EUREKA – Some proposed changes to the Woodford County zoning code will help landowners who live near wind farms, but whose properties are not involved in the projects.

“We are trying to protect people who live in and among these (wind farms) without (the turbines) interfering in their daily life,” said Shannon Rocke, a member of the Conservation, Planning and Zoning Committee. “It’s about property rights. These (turbines) are going to be up for 30 years.”

CP&Z member Duane Kingdon agreed. “There comes a time when we need to update our ordinances,” Kingdon said. “We now have more knowledge and more experience about the health effects of wind farms.”

The proposals, which require approval of the county board, include increasing the distance between a turbine and any non-participating, habitable farm; banning a turbine that would produce more than 30 hours of annual shadow flicker at a house on non-participating property; and financial proof that the wind farm owner can complete the project.

The ZBA also would require a Woodford County bank to hold half of the money needed to decommission a wind farm, with the remainder held in a surety bond.

“The decommissioning would have a restricting effect on profitability and would inhibit the ability to site a wind farm in Woodford County,” said Andrew Downey of Streator, who described himself as a turbine host and a consultant for Invenergy Wind.

Dan Davidson, a county resident who favors wind development, accused members of the CP&Z of being “anti-wind.”

“This is the only opportunity of Woodford County getting more revenue,” Davidson said. “There is a lot of bias against wind farms on this committee.”

Source:  By Cheryl Wolfe, www.pantagraph.com 29 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky