LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lenox turbines bad for town, tourists 

Credit:  The Berkshire Eagle, www.berkshireeagle.com 30 January 2012 ~~

Wind turbines on Lenox Mountain are a bad idea. In Berkshire County we are about conserving our natural resources. In Richmond we even have adopted the Scenic Mountains and Scenic Roads acts. Does everyone realize what this is going to do if the turbines get approved? It doesn’t seem so.

What about the people who live nearby? Every time I go near Jiminy Peak all I hear is a constant “whoosh” noise from the turbines. More studies need to be done on the health effects from these unsightly towers. There has not been enough time to get a solid understanding. I’m surprised Lenox would want them. The town is all for tourism and over time this is just going to drive tourists away. No more scenic mountaintops to look at. Its businesses will start to dwindle without them.

As a long-time Richmond resident whose parents owned a business in Lenox, I know what revenue the tourists bring in. Even with that aside, do we really want to look at these on a daily basis? There are many other alternatives that should be looked into first. Look at what West Stockbridge did. It has a small hydroelectric generation station at the headwaters of the Williams River. Same thing in Glendale on the Housatonic River.

Solar is also another alternative that would keep our ridges “clean” from eyesores. WMECO put a solar farm on contaminated land on Silver Lake in Pittsfield. Now that was a very good idea.

I may only be 26 years of age, but I know I don’t want my kids to have to grow up and look at these things. Think about what our kids and grandchildren will have to look at if these go up. It would be nothing like it is now. With other up and coming technologies I think making a decision to approve this would be simply irresponsible. It’s time for the older generation to take time to listen to the younger generation as we start to inherit this area.

JAMES SHOEMAKER

Richmond

Source:  The Berkshire Eagle, www.berkshireeagle.com 30 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon