[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Goodhue wind farm doesn’t make sense  

Credit:  The Republican Eagle, www.republican-eagle.com 29 January 2012 ~~

Even if the proposed Goodhue County wind farm never killed a bird or a bat, it wouldn’t make sense. The Prairie Island nuclear plant provides 50 times the electric power that T. Boone Picken’s 52 excess wind turbines.

In 2010 and 2011, U.S. wind farms had a capacity factor of 27 percent, which suggests the Goodhue project would provide a measly and intermittent 20-25 megawatts.

Our nation’s largest proposed wind project is off Cape Cod. U.S. Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass., estimates “This will be the most expensive and most heavily subsidized offshore wind farm in the country at over $2.5 billion, with power costs to the region that will be at least double.”

Figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration report that for an equivalent amount of energy produced, subsidies for oil and gas are 28 cents; nuclear energy, $1.79; wind, $32.59.

In addition to costs and wildlife threat, Goodhue locals are opposing the wind farm because of the noise. The intended setback from residences is far short of the 1 to 2 miles needed for relief from the low-frequency sounds. As a recent film documentary noted, “The towering turbines impose themselves on a residence like unwelcome guests at a dinner party. They emit a low-frequency sound, stronger at night, producing noises like a passing car with a deep bass on its stereo system. Subjects describe it variously as a jet that never lands or sneakers in the dryer at night.”

As to the environment, in 2010, Bentek Energy, a Colorado-based analytics firm, looked at power plant records in Colorado and Texas. Bentek concluded that despite large investments, wind-generated electricity has had minimal, if any, impact on carbon dioxide emissions. This results from on-and-off backup fossil fuel plants supporting intermittent wind output.

As Kevin Forbes, the director of the Center for the Study of Energy and Environmental Stewardship at Catholic University, said, “Wind energy gives people a nice warm fuzzy feeling that we’re taking action on climate change. Yet when it comes to CO2 emissions, the reality is that it’s not doing much of anything.”

There is a role for wind in our energy mix as a supplement in areas with consistent winds. But experience so far suggests taxpayer subsidy funds should be spent for wind energy research at facilities like the University of Minnesota’s Eolos Wind Research Station at UMore Park Rosemount.

Rolf Westgard

St. Paul

Source:  The Republican Eagle, www.republican-eagle.com 29 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.