LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wairarapa wind farm offer falls flat 

Credit:  By Don Farmer, Wairarapa Times-Age, www.times-age.co.nz 27 January 2012 ~~

Genesis Energy has failed to sway local communities from opposing a massive wind farm plan despite dangling a financial carrot.

The power giant this week offered a $750,000 deal as a way of compensating the people of townships such as Alfredton, Castle Hill and Tinui for problems associated with construction of the $1.6 billion Castle Hill Wind Farm that could not be otherwise mitigated.

But residents said the sticking point was that a proposed community trust would only be established if resource consent were granted on the terms sought.

Genesis is willing to put up $500,000 at the start of construction, and a further $50,000 each year for five years on the anniversary of work starting.

The resource consent hearing before a panel of commissioners re-convened in Masterton this week, having been stood down late last year when the panel asked Genesis Energy to take time out to re-think its proposal and provide more evidence on the impact of its plan.

Yesterday lawyer Phernne Tancock, representing the Castle Hill Wind Farm Action Group opposing the plan, said that until Tuesday Genesis Energy had refused to discuss the community fund.

She said now it was prepared to do so but only on the proviso that it was set up on the basis outlined in the offer and that consents were granted on the terms Genesis sought.

“This implies Genesis requires the commissioners to consent the whole application on Genesis terms, with Genesis conditions,” Ms Tancock said.

The action group welcomed the fact Genesis was willing to discuss a community trust but it was important this did not detract from “a robust assessment of the application before you”, the lawyer said.

The action group still considered the application for resource consent was deficient in many respects and should be rejected.

It said the panel should not be asked to choose between a community fund for compensation of social effects on one hand and having effective conditions that gave protection from the wind farm’s other adverse effects.

Ms Tancock said the $750,000 being offered was the same amount as Contact Energy offered for a considerably smaller wind farm being built elsewhere.

Genesis issued a one-page addition to its offer yesterday morning that named the organisations it would invite to each appoint a trust representative.

These were Genesis, Tinui Community, Alfredton community, Castle Hill community, Ngati Kahungunu, Rangitane, Tararua District Council and Masterton District Council.

Action group members said the list of organisations showed how little research Genesis had done as the power company had failed to include Pongaroa, Bideford and Tiraumea, all communities which would be affected by wind farm construction.

Earlier in the week Genesis Energy chief executive Albert Brantley told the panel his company made considerable efforts to establish very active dialogue with stakeholders.

He said Genesis had a history of making significant financial contributions to communities.

The hearing was expected to re-convene today and the commissioners will reserve a decision on the application.

Should the project go ahead it is expected to provide 185 jobs during the construction period, 40 ongoing jobs, and would bring millions of dollars to economies of both Masterton and Tararua districts.

Source:  By Don Farmer, Wairarapa Times-Age, www.times-age.co.nz 27 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon