[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Mull Hill windfarm fight putting strain on residents  

Credit:  Strathearn Herald, www.strathearnherald.co.uk 27 January 2012 ~~

I refer to the concerns raised by many regarding the proposed nine turbine 22.5 megawatt wind farm at Connachan Hill/Mull Hill.

It continues to put a great strain on residents in the area to yet again have to take action with another wind farm fight and it is time the planning systems were changed to stop Klondike-type wind farm operators seeking riches to the detriment of local residents and Scottish landscape.

If the wind farm were to go ahead it would provide very limited short-term employment, beyond that the benefit would not be to the community or indeed the country.

I understand in broad terms a typical wind farm costs around £1m per installed megawatt so in this instance that would presumably be in the region of £22m. This compares to a consumer and tax subsidy over the life of a wind farm of this type estimated at £3.5m per installed megawatt, (this is in excess of “normal” electricity costs) in this case consumer subsidies would amount to a staggering £79m.

The developer’s proposal of a community fund of £78,750 per annum is by contrast a trifling sum but the effect of tying in the Scottish consumer to inflated electricity prices for 25 years is to make the country ever less competitive and force more and more of its residents into fuel poverty.

There is a very clear Scottish planning guideline that states that the turbines should not be built within 2km of people’s homes yet time and time again the Scottish Government ignore their own guideline to the detriment of the health of residents where there are now proven health risks to anyone living within that distance. I believe there are some 10 homes in this category.

It is bizarre that the Scottish Government refuses to have nuclear primarily on health grounds yet are prepared to put at risk the health of Scottish residents to the benefit of non Scottish investors.

Finally how can a company whose latest accounts as filed with the Registrar of Companies show it to be owned by a husband and wife team based in Buckinghamshire with a registered office in London and shareholder funds of £41,000 be in a position to carry off a development with an estimated cost of in excess of £22m!

It is time for this government to get a grip on these unacceptable applications.

W G R Thomson

Received via email

Source:  Strathearn Herald, www.strathearnherald.co.uk 27 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.