[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Now the fight’s above ground 

Credit:  The Suffolk Times, suffolktimes.timesreview.com 26 January 2012 ~~

It isn’t possible that the directors of the Suffolk County Water Authority would harbor a grudge, is it?

They wouldn’t seek to erect a power-generating windmill, as big as any standing anywhere on the North Fork, in the middle of wooded preserve teeming with wildlife near the shores of a tranquil lake as a “gotcha!” for the town’s unyielding – and ultimately successful – opposition to their cockamamie scheme to spend millions to bring public water to Orient, where the majority of residents were dead set against it?

Would they?

As town officials and the folks in Orient discovered the hard way, when it comes to the SCWA, always expect the unexpected.

Now before anyone starts yelling “nimbyism!” we should point out that wind turbines, even those the size of the authority’s project, are permitted in Southold, in certain areas and under certain circumstances. Given their size, the town requires a minimum of seven acres, limits the height to 120 feet and requires a full 300 feet between the tower and a property line. The authority’s turbine meets all those standards, but it fails to pass the most basic test. Only bona fide agricultural operations can install wind turbines.

The Laurel Lake preserve is definitely not a farm.

Which brings us back to the authority’s standard line, voiced often during the Orient dispute, that as an authority it need not comply with local laws. In the end, a protracted court battle might prove that assertion to be true. But if the authority did anything right in Orient, it was to conclude, wisely, that legalities aside, squaring off against the citizenry is not a smart move.

If there’s more to the project than a callous attempt to stick it to the town, the authority would deserve credit for thinking green – and for trying to tap into a renewable energy resource to offset the need for fossil fuel-generated electricity to power the pumps that keep the water flowing across the North Fork. Still, the project seems grounded in a misunderstanding of the value of open space – a misunderstanding still prevalent in parts of the county’s western end. Just because there are no houses on the land doesn’t mean anything goes.

The authority would be wise to take a good, long look at its turbine project before it spins out of control.

Source:  The Suffolk Times, suffolktimes.timesreview.com 26 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon