[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Citizen action is gaining momentum, as it should 

Credit:  By Richard T. Clark, www.southcoasttoday.com 19 January 2012 ~~

As you drive westward along Route 80 in northern California, there is a section between Vacaville and Vallejo with a stretch of rolling, grass-covered hills that change color with the seasons. Some have speculated that these hills would be great sites for hundreds of industrial wind turbines. However, the entire region has been declared a recreational area, and therefore off limits for wind turbines. Wow!

How different things are here on the East Coast, where Fairhaven’s Bike Path Extension, clearly a recreational area, is to be the site of two giant, industrial wind turbines in close proximity to each other and to nearby residents. It’s hard to believe that the Conservation Commission has not protested such a move. Migratory birds are often seen in the selected area, and it is a fact that wind turbines would be a clear danger to them. The “infrasound” of wind turbines is particularly detrimental to bats. Let it be remembered that bats feed on mosquitoes, part of the balance of nature.

It’s said that the squeaky wheel gets the oil. In Fairhaven, protesting citizens get stonewalled, chastised, ignored and called names such as “political malcontents,” a favorite expression of Selectman Dr. Brian Bowcock from a few years ago. That situation may be about to change.

The malcontents do succeed now and then, as in the case of the sludge treatment debacle of recent history when Executive Secretary Jeffrey Osuch and Dr. Bowcock were beating the drums to bring sludge from surrounding communities to Fairhaven to be treated in the same general vicinity as the planned turbines. Citizen action and the dissemination of factual, objective information defeated that move, and the neighbors were spared the aroma of such a rotten deal.

There are reasonable health concerns or issues in regard to having industrial turbines located so close to residential and school areas, concerns that cannot callously be dismissed simply because there is not total agreement among scientific experts at the moment. The Falmouth experience should raise a red flag large enough to get the attention of the Fairhaven Board of Health and give the Board of Selectman second thoughts about the potential disaster, which they most certainly have the power to prevent.

What a wonderful world it would be if Fairhaven’s “town counsel” felt an obligation to recognize and defend the rights of ordinary citizens to protect themselves from dangerous decisions emanating from Town Hall. I suppose that could or would happen if the turbines were to be located in the Fort Phoenix area. Instead, they are intended for the same general neighborhood already plagued by the nauseating scent of the sewage treatment plant. That odor problem was supposed to have been resolved several years ago. Promises, promises!

There is strength in numbers, and they’re beginning to add up as more and more people are joining together to fight the turbines and challenge the Fairhaven “establishment.” That’s good news for Fairhaven. Hopefully the day will soon come when the selectmen’s turbine project will go the way of the sludge treatment plant proposal and we can all breathe a sigh of relief. If there is a lawsuit from the developer, the blame will fall upon the Board of Selectmen and the less-than-open way in which the project was pursued and resurrected.

Richard T. Clark lives in Fairhaven.

Source:  By Richard T. Clark, www.southcoasttoday.com 19 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon