[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Anti-Hayes activist backed gut feeling  

Credit:  John Edens in Queenstown, www.stuff.co.nz The Southland Times, 20 January 2012 ~~

An Alexandra man whose family fought Project Hayes yesterday said his gut feeling told him the energy firm knew a court would not overturn the original decision.

In November 2009, Judge Jon Jackson overturned consents for the farm, saying the environmental cost would be too high.

If approved, the Lammermoor Range would have been home to the largest wind farm in the southern hemisphere.

Environmentalist John Douglas, wife Sue and son Andrew, of Alexandra, spent tens of thousands of dollars fighting Meridian.

Mr Douglas yesterday said parties were previously directed to pay costs but this could be revisited

“Meridian knew they weren’t going to overturn the court decision,” he said.

Meridian Energy chief executive Mark Binns said the company portfolio had developed considerably and there were other projects with a higher commercial priority than Hayes.

“Withdrawing the consent applications is not only the most prudent commercial decision for Meridian, but also avoids prolonging uncertainty about this project for the community and the project’s supporters,” he said.

Mr Binns, who replaced outgoing chief executive Tim Lusk last year, said the decision was disappointing but it was right.

The firm reviewed Hayes against a portfolio of renewable development options and other projects had a higher commercial priority.

“Meridian now has a number of potential development options that would be progressed ahead of Project Hayes.”

In August 2010, the High Court partly upheld an appeal by Meridian against the Environment Court’s rejection of Hayes, directing the Environment Court to rethink its decision cancelling consents for the wind farm.

This prompted fresh legal action to the High Court and Court of Appeal before any reconsideration by the Environment Court.

But yesterday’s decision spells the end of the Hayes saga, although questions remain about costs and outstanding landscape classification in Central Otago.

Source:  John Edens in Queenstown, www.stuff.co.nz The Southland Times, 20 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.