[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine on councillor’s land dubbed a ‘blot’ 

Credit:  The Citizen, www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk 17 January 2012 ~~

Wind turbine proposals for a key planning decision maker’s farm have angered residents.

Stroud District Council development control committee chairman Graham Littleton wants to put up a 33.5m turbine on his farm.

But resident Gordon Davis, who can see the site from his home said it will not generate enough electricity and is in the wrong place.

Mr Littleton (Conservative, Hardwicke) will not be in the council chamber when his committee makes a decision on a piece of land he owns south of Velthouse Farm on February 14.

He said he has done everything by the book to avoid a conflict of interests.

But Mr Davis said he had concerns about the plans.

He also questioned how Mr Littleton’s committee could turn down plans for four 120m high turbines at Stinchcombe when he is in favour of a turbine on his land.

“A good part of Elmore and Westbury-on-Severn will see it,” he said. “It will be a blot on the landscape.”

The site is in Hardwicke parish, near the junction of the boundary with Elmore and Longney. Elmore Parish Council has objected, as has falconer Ben Long, who runs his business nearby. Hardwicke Parish Council wants to see the site before taking a view.

Mr Littleton’s planning agent Greg McCormick said the application is for an 11kilowatt turbine designed for low wind speeds and at a wind speed of 5.6 metres per second it will generate an average of 30,000 kWh/y [kiloWatt hours per year] – equivalent to the consumption of 6.84 average homes.

The tower would stand at 27m with the blades hitting an arc extending to 33.5m.

Mr Littleton said he should not be precluded from putting in a planning application because of his position.

“I chaired the committee when the Stinchcombe application was refused on landscape grounds,” he said.

“That was for 120m high turbines – my application is for a lot less than that.

“It will go before the committee on February 14 and I will not be in the chamber for that decision but I have a right to apply for planning permission, which I have done in the past.”

Source:  The Citizen, www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk 17 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky