LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind firm’s ‘PR stunt’ cuts no ice with Somerset protest 

Credit:  Western Daily Press, www.thisissomerset.co.uk 12 January 2012 ~~

An energy company’s decision to scale down its proposals for a wind farm near the M5 in Somerset has cut no ice with opponents.

Broadview Energy is now proposing four 130-metre turbines for a site at Pilrow, near Rooksbridge. The company, which has yet to apply for planning permission, had originally indicated up to six 140-metre masts.

But Nick Woolmington, chairman of No Pilrow Committee Against the Rooksbridge Wind Farm said yesterday: “This will make no difference to our opposition.

“Local people have never been consulted on size or number of turbines that Broadview intend to build. This current proposal is obviously dictated to them by the fundamentals of the site itself but will almost certainly be presented as a blatant PR exercise to try and convince some of their willingness to listen to local voices.

“As such, it is nothing more than the usual ploy of asking above worth and settling for less and pretending that it is part of a consultation process, thereby hoping to placate opposition.

“Bearing in mind some of the horrifying pictures of disintegrating turbines in recent gales, one does have to ask the very serious question as to whether a wind farm adjacent to the very busy M5 should be given any consideration at all.”

Tom Cosgrove, Broadview project manager, said: “We wanted to get as much input from the local community as possible through our various consultation events. We’ve listened to the feedback and, wherever possible, factored this into our final proposal.”

“It is important to recognise that larger wind turbines produce more sustainable electricity. However, it is equally important to balance maximising the renewable energy benefits of the project against minimising potential impacts on the local environment. We have found the right balance.”

Source:  Western Daily Press, www.thisissomerset.co.uk 12 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky