LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pegler calls for wind farm change 

Credit:  The Border Watch, www.borderwatch.com.au 9 January 2012 ~~

Mount Gambier MP Don Pegler was among 275 individuals and organisations who have made submissions to the State Government on the new Wind Farm Development Amendment (DPA).

Mr Pegler, along with several South East residents, local councils and the South Australian Farmers Federation, have made submissions to the Department of Planning and Local Government.

The government called for submissions as part of a public consultation process shortly after the DPA was announced by former Premier Mike Rann in October last year, including restricting people’s rights to object to new wind farm developments near their homes.

In his submission, Mr Pegler objected to the DPA on the grounds of aesthetics and the proposed short distances between turbines and dwellings.

“I object to the separation distances of 1km from residences and 2km from townships,” he said in his submission.

“These distances should be at least 2km and 5km respectively.”

Mr Pegler also said he did not support the recommendation that wind farm developments were assigned Category 2 status, which removed the rights of residents to appeal to new developments.

Although supportive of renewable energy in South Australia, the South Australian Farmers Federation (SAFF) objected to wind farm developments on farm land on the grounds that it could compromise the future of land adjacent to wind farms.

“If turbines were sited in remote areas and on land that had little agricultural value, then SAFF would have no major concerns,” the peak agricultural organisation said.

“However, turbines are being placed on highly valued, highly productive and reliable broadacre cropping land.”

SAFF also raised concerns over the inability of fire-bombing planes to fly near turbines, which could compromise the safety of farmers and rural communities.

The written submissions will be followed by public consultation meetings across the state in the next few weeks, during which submitters will have the chance to present their views verbally.

A consultation meeting will also be held at the Naracoorte Town Hall at 7pm on Tuesday, January 24.

Mr Pegler and several South East residents have requested to speak at the Naracoorte meeting.

Source:  The Border Watch, www.borderwatch.com.au 9 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon