[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lenox Wind panel halts meetings  

Credit:  By Clarence Fanto, Berkshire Eagle Staff, www.berkshireeagle.com 5 January 2012 ~~

LENOX – The town’s Wind Energy Research Panel has suspended temporarily its weekly meetings to prepare a final report on the proposed municipal wind-turbine project on Lenox Mountain.

The committee has asked the Select Board for a one-month extension of its original Jan. 15 deadlne for a report.

At least two dozen residents, mostly from Lenox and Richmond, attended last week’s meeting and several made impassioned pleas to derail the project.

“There are so many uncertanties that cannot be resolved with regard to ecology, health issues, destruction of the mountain and financial issues” in the time remaining for the panel’s discussions, said Neal H. Pilson, a part-time Richmond resident and former president of CBS Sports.

“It seems to me that this committee can only report that it’s impossible to recommend that the town go forward with wind turbines,” he said.

Ed Carter, a 40-year Lenox resident and an IBM engineer, questioned the project’s viability from a business standpoint. He cited all the concerns raised by the committee as “show-stoppers.”

“It’s a no-go situation if you analyze it from a lot of different angles,” he said.

Carter contended that cutting-edge, alternative-energy solutions are outpacing the need for wind turbines.

“This is not the technology that the smart people on Wall Street think will be used to generate energy as we go forward,” he
added, citing what he described as plunging stock prices for wind turbine companies.

Richmond resident John Whitney described potential threats to the underground spring supplying “absolutely pristine” water to 19 homes on View Drive posed by blasting during construction of wind turbines.

Terry Flynn of Stockbridge warned of a “massive impact on the whole county” if other towns consider and approve wind turbine projects.

“Every town would contribute to a momentum that would be devastating to the Berkshires and would create great damage to the mountains,” he said.

Prior to the public discussion, members of the panel explored how to sum up their findings.

“We’ve come a long way toward the middle since the beginning,” said panelist Channing Gibson, a project opponent. He noted that the committee had been set up “in an adversarial way.”

As part of the final report, members could write a one-page summary of their own conclusions, suggested Christopher Magee, the MIT engineer and project opponent who was attending his final meeting because of an overseas work assignment.

Magee outlined his objections to the Weston Solutions report commissioned by the town which found the Lenox Mountain site “viable” for wind energy but also recommended further studies.

He challenged the technical credentials of the study’s unidentified authors.

“I really don’t think much of that report, it’s very misleading,” Magee asserted. Magee listed the company’s lack of data on wind turbine gearbox failures as undermining the report’s credibility.

The panel’s final report may also include team summaries of the major issues identified as potential stumbling blocks or as assets for the project.

Those include financial benefits and energy-cost savings for the town, if any, health concerns stemming from potential low-frequency vibration from the turbines, environmental impact on the mountaintop and the required access road, and the effects on the project of solar panel installations that the town is pursuing.

The panel is divided into three supporters and three critics, with an alternate to fill in on each side as needed.

The committee is scheduled to resume its deliberations on Thursday, Jan. 19, at 6 p.m. with one or two meetings to follow.

Source:  By Clarence Fanto, Berkshire Eagle Staff, www.berkshireeagle.com 5 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.