LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Attendees lash out county energy meeting 

The underlying rancor surrounding proposed Cape wind energy projects surfaced when Eric Bibler, a vocal opponent of the proposals, rose to speak. "You're an (expletive)," Brewster Selectman Edward Lewis said before storming out of the room.

Credit:  By Patrick Cassidy, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 5 January 2012 ~~

BARNSTABLE – Faced with a full house and a heap of paperwork, a county panel examining the activities of two regional energy agencies decided Wednesday to hold a separate meeting Feb. 1 to take public comment on its work.

The move angered officials who came from as far as Martha’s Vineyard expecting a chance to voice their support for the Cape Light Compact and Cape and Vineyard Electric Cooperative, the agencies under review by a subcommittee of the Barnstable County Assembly of Delegates. More than 40 local officials and members of the public packed the assembly’s chamber for Wednesday’s two-hour meeting.

“The idea that we have people coming over here from the Vineyard, people who have been on these committees for years, the idea that you are going to shut them down is outrageous,” cooperative President Charles McLaughlin said.

The subcommittee met to discuss its next steps after receiving hundreds of pages of documents from the two agencies, Chairman Ronald Bergstrom said.

The point was not to deliberate on wind turbines, the issue that led to the subcommittee’s creation after questions were raised about money transferred from the compact to the cooperative for wind energy projects.

Supporters of the compact and cooperative say ratepayers benefit from cooperation between the agencies. They argue that the renewable energy projects the cooperative is developing in various Cape towns will help suppress electricity prices for compact customers.

Subcommittee member Leo Cakounes of Harwich had several questions about the cooperative’s activities, including whether minutes existed for the agency’s executive committee. Despite finding reference to at least four meetings of the executive committee, corresponding minutes were missing, Cakounes said.

This is important because the executive committee may have taken votes that would typically be the responsibility of a governmental body’s full board, he said.

Subcommittee member Deborah McCutcheon of Truro had similar questions about budgets and minutes from the executive committee for the compact.

“Throughout the process, the Cape Light Compact has declined to give this committee their full budgets,” she said, adding that the subcommittee had received only the county portion of the budget, which covers about $1 million of the agency’s roughly $18 million budget. The remainder comes from ratepayers, the state and grants.

The subcommittee voted to request the executive committee minutes for both organizations.

Kevin Galligan, program manager for the compact’s energy efficiency program, said much of the oversight that critics want is supplied by state agencies that hold hearings on the compact’s plans.

“All of this is recorded and documented,” he said.

The underlying rancor surrounding proposed Cape wind energy projects surfaced when Eric Bibler, a vocal opponent of the proposals, rose to speak.

“You’re an (expletive),” Brewster Selectman Edward Lewis said before storming out of the room.

Source:  By Patrick Cassidy, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 5 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky