[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Trust condemns Holyrood’s seasonal ‘burying’ of windfarm decision  

Credit:  John McHale, Reporter, grough, www.grough.co.uk 1 January 2011 ~~

A conservation charity has condemned the Scottish Government for ‘burying’ bad news of another windfarm during the festive season.

The John Muir Trust said the approval of an extension to the development on south Lewis will bring further destruction to one of the UK’s best wild-land areas.

The trust said it was dismayed to see the festive period used for the announcement of the east extension to the Muaitheabhal windfarm.

Helen McDade, head of policy, said: “This approval comes before a sod has been turned on the original site.

“If developers can come back after the whole planning process, including a public local inquiry, and significantly change their plans before a sod is turned with no real scrutiny, it makes a mockery of the planning process.

“There would seem to be worrying pointers about Scottish Government and planning policy that might be taken from this, alongside other planning approvals over the last months, including 59 turbines at Dorenell in Moray also festively approved, and the Beauly-Denny transmission line finally limping home with virtually no change from the scheme first lodged in 2006.”

Ms McDade said the Scottish Government’s record shows that it approves almost 100 per cent of large onshore wind developments, regardless of the level of evidence and concern on issues such as the impact on natural environment areas including wild land, damage to peatlands, and level of public objection. She pointed to the 20,000 objections to Beauly-Denny power line as an example.

“This is even the case, as with Muaitheabhal, where significant adverse effects to nationally designated sites are accepted by the government’s own advisors,” she said. “The Scottish Government Reporter for a public local inquiry, examining a version of the Muaitheabhal scheme concluded, ‘that the wind farm would have significant adverse effects on scenic qualities for which the south Lewis, Harris and North Uist national scenic area was designated.’

“There is no evidence that the redesigned scheme is an improvement as there has been no further examination in public and the visualisation commissioned by the John Muir Trust shows that this will still have a huge impact on areas within the national scenic area.

“Over thirty turbines, taller than the London Eye, will be visible for Bheinn Mhor, within the NSA.

“Developers are using the planning process as a game, where they get as much as they can in the first round, then come back and back again.

“Perhaps it is time to accept that there is little point to public local inquiries into wind developments when no amount of evidence seems to alter the inevitable decision.

“Tens of thousands of Scottish citizens have spent hundreds of thousands of hours and pounds bringing forward good evidence to inquiries. Sadly, the results do not suggest this is a fair and democratic process.

“It is essential that we get a national energy strategy which shows a coherent plan for industrial wind generation whilst having some regard for protecting our children’s heritage.”

The John Muir Trust is running a Wild Land Campaign in response to what it sees as threats from development, seeking a designation to protect the UK’s best wild land.

Source:  John McHale, Reporter, grough, www.grough.co.uk 1 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.