[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Big win for ‘Big Wind’ SJC OKs power-sale deal, but financing still scarce  

Credit:  By Greg Turner, bostonherald.com 29 December 2011 ~~

Cape Wind’s developer was buoyed by a key legal victory yesterday from the state’s highest court, but pushed back the construction start by another year amid persistent questions about financing for the offshore energy project.

“We’ve made predictions in the past. This project has been under development for over 10 years, and the important thing is we keep moving it forward one step at a time,” Cape Wind president Jim Gordon told reporters on a conference call. “We’re hoping that within about a year we will be able to be producing clean, homegrown energy.”

But Cape Wind’s 130 turbines won’t be up and spinning in 2012. A spokesman later clarified Gordon’s remarks, saying the plan is for construction, expected to last 18 months, to begin in 2013.

After Cape Wind cleared its final regulatory hurdle in April, a company exec predicted the project would start this past fall. Since then, Cape Wind has been unable to land buyers for all of its electricity, and it lost out on a federal loan subsidy, making it harder to secure private investments.

The Supreme Judicial Court handed Cape Wind a major victory yesterday, upholding the state Department of Public Utilities’ approval of the project’s 15-year power-purchase deal with National Grid.

The electricity could cost ratepayers as much as $695 million above market prices, which the DPU deemed “expensive” but “reasonable” given the project’s environmental benefits.

The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, among a group of Cape Wind critics that appealed the DPU’s November 2010 decision, ripped the SJC’s ruling as a “blow to ratepayers, businesses and municipalities.”

The trade group Associated Industries of Massachusetts claimed the contract was not competitively bid and will saddle ratepayers with higher energy costs.

“We continue to maintain that state regulators fell short of their responsibilities to consumers by approving this agreement at time when other utilities were finding plentiful renewable electricity at less than half the cost of Cape Wind,” said AIM president Richard Lord, referring to land-based wind energy deals made by Nstar.

Gordon touted Cape Wind’s estimated 1,000 jobs and vowed victory in a lawsuit challenging the lease to build in federal waters.

“We fully expect to sell the balance of Cape Wind’s power,” he said. “We have people in the investment community that are very interested in the project.”

Source:  By Greg Turner, bostonherald.com 29 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: