[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Montrose could be “turbine town”  

Credit:  Montrose Review, www.montrosereview.co.uk 21 December 2011 ~~

The siting of wind turbines at GlaxoSmithKline’s factory could set a precedent for the south of Montrose, it was claimed this week.

Ian Paton, spokesman for the No Way GSK action group opposed to the £8 million project, also challenged the safety aspects of placing the two 426-feet high towers so close to a chemical plant.

He voiced his concerns after a photograph of a wind turbine at Ardrossan, Ayrshire, on fire during the recent storms hit the national press.

The incident was dismissed as a “freak occurrence” by energy experts, and GSK has pointed out that the turbines proposed for Montrose would have a sophisticated four-stage detection system to tackle fires, including a suppressant gas to extinguish any outbreak. The company has also said the proposed sites for the turbines have been fully risk-assessed.

But Mr Paton said the Ardrossan fire demonstrates that there is still a risk.

He said: “It is all very well for GSK’s project engineer to tell us that computers will provide a four-stage fire protection system. We all know how reliable computers are don’t we? Is this meant to reassure us that the numbers of wind turbine fires and catastrophic accidents from elsewhere in Scotland and around the world cannot happen in Montrose?

“If such a fire led on to a total turbine collapse and 426 feet of tower collapsed into the chemical plant below, can you imagine the mayhem? What on earth is flowing through that tangle of pipes and what is contained in these large storage tanks dotted all around?

“God forbid, but it would be interesting to hear Angus Council’s defence of not following the Scottish Government’s guideline of a minimum separation distance of two kilometres between turbines and other buildings. It is interesting to note here that if the guideline were adopted, there could be no turbines erected closer to GSK than halfway across the Basin or beyond Usan.”

At its last meeting, Ferryden Community Council agreed to write to the local authority asking if implementation of the two kilometre guideline could be investigated.

A council spokeswoman said that the authority does have criteria against which renewable energy proposals are assessed.

She said: “The council has policies on renewable energy and wind turbine development in both the Dundee and Angus Structure Plan 2002 and in the Angus Local Plan Review 2009. These provide detailed policy tests against which all relevant planning applications are assessed.”

Mr Paton said that Montrose risks becoming the “turbine town of Angus” if the proposal, which GSK hopes will cut its carbon footprint by around 75 per cent, goes ahead.

He said: “This proposal could very easily be a kind of ‘loss leader’ for the green industry. If GSK succeed with this application, The Master Plan for South Montrose could sprout a rash of towers within the town boundary making Montrose the ‘Turbine Town’ of Angus. Is this what the people of Montrose want?

“You really cannot blame GSK for taking advantage of the fact that Angus Council are not disposed to implement the government’s two kilometre guideline; they see the chance to make money, or save money, which is entirely honourable, but what is not honourable is when you do it and other people pay the price.”

Source:  Montrose Review, www.montrosereview.co.uk 21 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.