Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind farm campaigners in natural beauty status bid
Credit: Yorkshire Post, www.yorkshirepost.co.uk 20 December 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Groups campaigning against proposals to build wind turbines on the Yorkshire Wolds are calling for the area to be designated a National Park or Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) in order to prevent an onslaught of future planning applications from energy companies.
The No to Wolds Wind Farm Group called on councillors to officially back their campaign after the East Riding Council (ERYC) planning committee rejected plans to build a 200ft high anemometer on Scarborough Road, Nafferton. Proposals for the wind monitoring mast, which were submitted by Goah Energy, would have been followed by plans to build four large turbines standing 410ft high.
The group’s members are arguing that AONB status would offer the Wolds some protection from future proposals and say they have the support of many local residents, whose view of the Wolds landscape would be ruined by the turbines.
Following the committee’s decision, the group’s chairman Steve Hey said: “This could be the wind of change needed, a significant moment when the bigger picture has finally been seen. It would seem the future protection of the Yorkshire Wolds has now become a high priority for ERYC.”
But Coun Jonathan Owen, who spoke against the proposals at the committee meeting, warned AONB status would only afford limited protection from wind farm applications and that the campaigners would still have to fight developers on a case-by-case basis.
He said: “I am in favour of green energy out at sea but object very strongly to wind farms on land. Building an anemoeter is often a precursor to a wind farm development, so I spoke out against it. There is definitely a growing groundswell of local people against these plans.
“AONB status adds weight to the case but you can make an argument that it is not a total solution. I support it in principle but it would be necessary to continue to contest each application as it arose.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: