LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.
»» Search…

News Watch Home

Watford wind project appeal to be heard 

Credit:  By DANIEL PUNCH, The Observer, www.theobserver.ca 16 December 2011 ~~

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


Opponents of the government-approved Zephyr wind farm project near Watford will get the chance to state their case to Ontario’s Environmental Review Tribunal.

A preliminary hearing to appeal the project will be held Dec. 22 at Lambton County’s Wyoming council chambers. The next hearing is scheduled for Jan. 11.

The Middlesex-Lambton Wind Action Group (WAG) filed the appeal in the wake of government approval for the $22-million, four-turbine, 10-MW wind farm. Green Breeze Energy Inc. is currently building the farm’s infrastructure near Churchill Line between Ebenezer and Walnut roads.

WAG member Esther Wrightman says the group is demanding a proper health study before the government goes through with wind energy projects.

“It needs to be addressed, it needs to be looked at, we need to have a study,” Wrightman said. “Without the information, I don’t know how they can feel comfortable installing these machines near people.”

The provincial government released a report Friday asserting wind turbines cause no direct health effects past a regulated distance.

The study was conducted by HGC Engineering and then reviewed by three independent noise experts. It concluded that Ontario’s regulations are rigorous, government spokesperson Kate Jordan said.

“We want to be responsive to concerns that some people have expressed,” Jordan said. “Ontarians should be assured that they have one the strictest sound criteria.”

This is the second ERT tribunal for an Ontario wind farm this year. An appeal was denied for the Kent Breeze wind power project near Thamesville when the tribunal deemed there wasn’t enough evidence to show harmful effects.

“The wind ministry would have touted it as a success,” Wrightman said, “But when you read the results of the decision, they said people can be harmed by wind turbines.”

Brent Hall – vice president of strategic planning for the Zephyr project – said Green Breeze Energy wants to avoid rehashing issues the ERT already addressed in Thamesville. They filed a motion to limit the hearing to new information.

“We’re not interested in spending money to hear the same witnesses over and over,” Hall said.

The Zephyr project has been approved by the government and meets or exceeds all safety regulations.

“We’re confident that we’re building an environmentally safe and friendly project,” he said.

Wrightman says she spoke with families living near the Thamesville turbines who have experienced dizziness, migraines and other health concerns. She called the government’s 550 metre minimum setback “a number that was picked out of a hat.”

The 550 metre setback prevents turbines from being built too close to residences. It follows World Health Organization guidelines.

The ERT’s preliminary hearing was originally scheduled for Dec. 15 but was rescheduled and confirmed for Dec. 22.

The tribunal has the power to squash the project or provide recommendations, the ERT web site says. A decision must me made within six months of the appeal.

Construction continues on the Zephyr project and Hall said it should be operational by the end of January and providing power to the grid by March.

Source:  By DANIEL PUNCH, The Observer, www.theobserver.ca 16 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


News Watch Home

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.