[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

New turbine plan collapses  

Credit:  The Berwick Advertiser, www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk 16 December 2011 ~~

“Enough is enough” was the message as councillors, backed by vocal opposition, overwhelmingly threw out a controversial wind turbine plan last week.

The proposal to erect a 255-foot turbine on Harehope Estate at New Bewick, close to the National Park, was rejected by the county’s planning and environment committee members against planners’ advice.

The scheme had attracted 96 letters of objection.

The planning officer’s report had concluded: “On balance, the potential benefits of sustainable renewable energy from a local source are considered sufficient to outweigh the impacts on the character of the landscape, and visual and residential amenity.”

Agent Richard Garland, speaking on behalf of the applicant, said it was part of the estate’s drive to embrace their environmental and social responsibilities.

“Contrary to the views of the vocal minority, the majority of the people in the locality are actually very relaxed about the proposal,” he added.

However councillors were not persuaded. Moving refusal, Councillor John Taylor said that in 24 years as a councillor he had never had so many communications on one issue. He feels it is as divisive as the foxhunting debate.

“It’s right across the board, right across the political persuasions. It’s a feeling that enough is enough,” he said. “We have got to start and draw the line on this.

“It’s an industrial development in a very, very rural landscape. The benefits that are produced are seriously outweighed by the negatives.”

Coun Paul Kelly questioned the siting of the turbine, saying the “scales came down very firmly on the side of dis-benefits”. He said: “If you are going to build a turbine of this size, you want it to work and putting it in a place where there’s almost no wind is pointless.

“The landscape of Northumberland is precious and we have sacrificed a considerable amount of it already by our own judgments and by appeal judgments.

“We need to preserve as much of it as possible for future generations. Let’s not sit here as nodding donkeys, agreeing to other every application simply because it agrees with government policy.”

Coun Dougie Watkin highlighted the harm that would be caused to the vista from Ros Castle – one of the best 360-degree viewpoints in the country – describing the “industrial, not agricultural” turbine as a “travesty”. He said: “It would demean the entire county.”

Local member Anthony Murray said such a structure would affect the area’s tourism appeal, which would damage not just the tourism industry but have a knock-on effect on a number of service industries.

Anthony Meikle, of Save Northumberland’s Environment, said: “It will certainly be the biggest and most industrial feature in what is essentially a very rural landscape. It really will be the proverbial blot on the landscape.”

He also questioned the applicant’s claims that this turbine in a “natural valley amphitheatre” would produce 37 per cent of its 500kw capacity, saying this is far above the north east average of 22 per cent.

Coun Wayne Daley suggested the committee should examine claimed outputs in such applications, but was told by development manager Karen Ledger that they could not be considered.

The guidance said a small development could still make a valuable contribution.

He argued that this was ‘opening the floodgates’ as the county would have to keep approving turbines in an effort to hit its Government targets, particularly if outputs fell short of applicants’ estimates.

A scheme for a single turbine near Ponteland was also considered, and rejected by the committee.

During the discussion of the Ponteland plans, Coun Daley also questioned whether the committee should be taking any decision at all on wind turbines while a bill which would ensure that turbines had to be more than 1,500m from homes was going through Parliament.

But he was told that there was nothing in current legislation and so was not a material consideration.

The nearest residential properties to the New Bewick site are 750m away.

Source:  The Berwick Advertiser, www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk 16 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter