[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County approves wind turbine at slaughterhouse near Dixon 

Credit:  Posted by Barry Eberling, Daily Republic, www.dailyrepublic.com 13 December 2011 ~~

FAIRFIELD – A lamb processing plant near Dixon has received county permission to build a 282-foot-tall wind turbine on its property.

Most of the massive wind turbines in Solano County are in the Montezuma Hills, where about 800 generate power for Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. But Superior Farms wants one that would sit alone amid the rural flatlands at Highway 113 and Midway Road and provide electricity solely for the business.

There is a local precedent for building a turbine this size to help power a single business, but not within the rural county. Anheuser-Busch recently had a turbine constructed at its brewery within Fairfield city limits.

The county Planning Commission in November approved allowing the Superior Farms turbine. A neighbor appealed the issue to the county Board of Supervisors. The board on Tuesday unanimously approved allowing the turbine.

Ken Odom has a kennel next to Superior Farms. He noted that the Planning Commission gave Superior Farms the option of putting the turbine in a wastewater pond on the property. He expressed concern that building the foundation for the turbine 30 feet deep there could lead to groundwater pollution.

He also raised concerns about the proposed turbine being noisy and having the potential to cause damage if a spinning blade were to be hurled from it. Several other nearby property owners also oppose the project, bringing up such issues as the aesthetics of having a huge turbine in the area.

Shane MacKenzie of Superior Farms said the company has plants in several states and that the Solano County plant employs 156 people. The PG&E bill last year came to $893,000 and a wind turbine could provide 43 percent of the energy, he said.

Superior Farms wants to team with Foundation Windpower to build a turbine on the property. It costs $10 to process a lamb at the Denver plant and $19 at the Dixon plant, he said. The company is looking for ways to make the Dixon plant more efficient, MacKenzie said.

The company wants to be part of Solano County and doesn’t want to have to move, he said.

Superior Farms proposes to build the turbine outside of the wastewater pond, but that would require setback and noise waivers from a neighboring property owner. A representative for that neighboring property said that no deal has been struck for the alternative site.

That could leave the site in the wastewater pond as the only option. A permit would be needed from the state Regional Water Quality Control Board to build the turbine in the wastewater pond.

Supervisor Linda Seifert said the county needs a policy for individual wind turbines of this size that might be proposed outside of the Montezuma Hills wind turbine area.

“I like the idea of alternative energy,” she said. “Some people might consider (turbines) unsightly and I don’t particularly like the one at Anheuser-Busch. But there are tradeoffs.”

Supervisor Barbara Kondylis also saw the tradeoffs.

“I really am torn,” she said. “I love the project but I don’t know if I’d want to be living next door.”

The board decided that Superior Farms should have to pay to install trees on three neighboring properties to block the view of the turbine, if those property owners want the trees. It set a total cost of $15,000 for the trees, $5,000 per property.

Source:  Posted by Barry Eberling, Daily Republic, www.dailyrepublic.com 13 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon