[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Technical problems delay wind farm application 

Credit:  Hunts Post, www.huntspost.co.uk 7 December 2011 ~~

Residents in Hemingford Grey are claiming a cautious victory after receiving indications that Huntingdonshire District Council is to reject plans for a wind turbine.

Assistant development management officer at HDC, Gavin Sylvester, wrote to Amber Real Estate Investments on November 30 to say officers “are minded to refuse” a planning application for a single 77-metre (253-foot) wind turbine at Galley Hill – a site just off the A14 by the eastbound junction for St Ives.

The technical reasons outlined by HDC include the results of a report by the Ministry of Defence, which said the proposed turbine would cause “unacceptable interference” to the air traffic control radar at Cambridge Airfield.

Councillors were also concerned Amber Investments had not demonstrated that the noise output from the turbine would not cause harm to residents – particularly those on Marsh Lane and The Bungalow at Woolpack Farm.

Other areas of concern included the adverse visual impact the proposed turbine and the impact on heritage sites including conservation areas, and specifically the Grade II-listed Manor House in the village, which would be in a direct line of sight of the proposed turbine.

Given the amount of extra survey work required as a result of the objections, HDC has advised that it will refuse permission for the plans unless they are withdrawn by Friday. Withdrawal would allow the developers another nine months to revise the application.

The council also said that the RSPB objected to the proposal because “the assessment of the risks posed by the turbine to nature conservation is considered to be inadequate,” while the Highways Agency said the turbine’s location – close to the A14 – would be an “unacceptable safety risk” in the event of ice shedding or structural failure.

Campaigner Esther Harrod told The Hunt Post: “This certainly looks promising. It seems some of the technical issues on which the application could be refused are insurmountable, but it depends on what the company comes back with, and whether or not they can address those issues.”

As previously reported by The Hunts Post, Amber Real Estate Investments (AREI) already has permission to build an intensive poultry farm on the site and has applied to install 18 tanks capable of holding 37 tonnes of liquefied petroleum gas.

Source:  Hunts Post, www.huntspost.co.uk 7 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky