[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

National windfarm strategy 

Credit:  Berwickshire News, www.berwickshirenews.co.uk 8 December 2011 ~~

The controversial approval of two windfarm developments in Berwickshire was brought up during a Government debate on windfarms last week.

South of Scotland MSP Jim Hume, demanded that ministers create a national strategy to oversee the development of wind turbines and John Lamont MSP called for a halt on further largescale windfarm developments until they do.

Mr Hume, who has made numerous calls for such legislation to be put into place, raised the subject of the windfarms at Fallago Rig and Drone Hill during the discussions last Thursday, December 2. Both windfarms had been rejected by Scottish Borders Council but were ultimately given the green light by the Government.

Highlighting these cases, Mr Hume said: “There are ambitious targets to be met and wind farms should, rightly, play their part in meeting those aims alongside other forms of energy generation. That is not in question.

“However, it’s time that the Government gave serious consideration to the cumulative effect upon communities of nearby wind farm developments to avoid the developer led situation that currently exists.

“Here in the Borders two extremely contentious wind farm developments at Fallago Rig and Drone Hill were rejected by the public and the local planning authority, only for the Government to run roughshod over local democracy and approve both developments.

“This has not been forgotten in Berwickshire. On several occasions I have called on the Scottish Government to formulate a national strategy to oversee developments of this kind to help restore public confidence in the planning system. I will repeat that request again this evening.”

Liberal Democrat MSP Mr Hume wasn’t the only local politician to call on the Government to protect local communities. There was cross-party support for the motion, with Berwickshire & Roxburgh Conservative MSP John Lamont, too making his feelings heard during last week’s debate which attracted around 150 members of the public, including a large contingent from the Borders,

Following the debate, Mr Lamont told ‘The Berwickshire News’ that whilst he felt wind power was beneficial,he often felt that the worries of residents living close to earmarked windfarm sites weren’t properly addressed,

“Whilst attaining clean, renewable energy sources should always remain a priority for Scotland, current strategies of the SNP Government excessively burden communities, outweighing any possible benefits.

“By increasing the role wind power plays in meeting our electricity needs the Scottish Government have effectively restricted the expansion of other forms of renewable energy. Wind power is not and should not be the only solution.

“What annoys me and many of my constituents is the failure of the planning system to deal with the legitimate concerns of local residents about large scale wind farms in their area. In many cases, a wind farm application may be opposed by local residents, community councils, councillors, and planning officials. Yet the developer may then appeal to a Scottish Government appointed Reporter which, in many cases will impose the will of the Scottish Government and approve the application. No wonder so many Scots feel that the planning system is stacked against them.

“Wind power certainly has a place within Scotland but that place needs to be evaluated alongside other forms of renewable energy and, critically, the views of local communities who have to accommodate these industrial wind farms.

“The SNP Government needs to set out a clear and coherent strategy on windfarm developments within the planning framework. Until it does so, I believe that the Government should stop any new applications for large windfarms.”

Source:  Berwickshire News, www.berwickshirenews.co.uk 8 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon