[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Feds rule BPA wind-power shut-off was unfair 

Credit:  By Hal Bernton, Seattle Times staff reporter, seattletimes.nwsource.com 7 December 2011 ~~

Federal regulators Wednesday ruled that the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) had unfairly discriminated against wind-power producers when it ordered periodic shutdowns of their turbines earlier this year.

The ruling is a boost to wind-power producers who had argued that Bonneville’s actions violated transmission contracts. Producers said the threat of curtailment orders would inject new economic uncertainty into the development of wind power in the Northwest.

“I think the danger was that if this were allowed to continue, it would have had a chilling effect going forward,” said Don Furman, senior vice president at Iberdola Renewables, a major wind generator in the Northwest. “I don’t know how you would have gotten a bank to lend if you didn’t know … if you were going to be allowed to operate.”

The dispute reflects broader strains in the regional power system as it seeks to integrate wind power. The supply of wind power has dramatically expanded during the past decade, spurred by federal tax incentives and state requirements to buy renewable electricity.

Bonneville, which operates the regional transmission lines and sells hydro power from federal dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers, has been at the forefront of bringing wind power into the system

For Bonneville, the toughest challenges have come in the spring and early summer when snow melts increase river flows and blustery winds boost wind production. Also, to protect migrating salmon, more water is run through the turbines rather than over the dams.

Earlier this year, those factors contributed to a big glut of power in regional markets. It then crafted an “environmental dispatch” policy that could be used to curtail the wind-power production to help manage the system..

In a roughly seven-week period that ended July 10, Bonneville shut down more than 5 percent of the wind-power production and substituted hydro power from federal dams.

The BPA policy was then challenged in a complaint to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and a separate federal lawsuit.

Bonneville officials, wind-power producers and others have been involved in negotiations to reach a settlement, and Bonneville Administrator Steve Wright hoped that FERC would hold off on a ruling until that happened.

“We are surprised and very disappointed that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission would choose at this moment to render a decision when it is aware that we have been urged by many members of the Northwest Congressional delegation to settle this issue, and when settlement discussions are proceeding in good faith,” he said.

The federal ruling found that Bonneville policy “significantly diminishes” open access to power transmission. Under the ruling, Bonneville officials have 90 days to come up with new rules that do not discriminate against wind producers. Bonneville also could ask FERC to reconsider the decision, according to a Bonneville spokesman.

Wind generators lose their government tax credits when they shut down because those benefits are pegged to electricity production.

The FERC decision appears to put pressure on Bonneville to take wind power even when additional supply will glut the power markets.

In extreme cases, the markets shift into “negative pricing,” when BPA must pay power users to accept the electricity.

The BPA had argued that it shouldn’t have to pay negative prices to help out wind-power producers.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Source:  By Hal Bernton, Seattle Times staff reporter, seattletimes.nwsource.com 7 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon