[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm noise nuisance couple speak of relief  

Credit:  By SHARON PELL, Spalding Guardian, www.spaldingtoday.co.uk 6 December 2011 ~~

“Making plans” is what Jane and Julian Davis are most looking forward to after their five-year wind turbine legal battle came to an end last week.

The couple reached a secret settlement in their High Court case, which they launched after claiming the wind farm at Deeping St Nicholas drove them out of their nearby home.

The couple describe themselves as “happy and relieved” to have a conclusion to the battle, which had engulfed half of their married life.

Jane (55) explained: “We have been married for ten years, and we’ve spent five-and-a-half on this, one year fighting breast cancer, my mum was terminally ill for a year before she died and Julian’s dad was also ill.

“We’ve not been able to make any plans for anything. We have been very low and depressed about things.

“We used to go away and visit arts and craft shops and buy something for our home but we have not been able to do that because we didn’t feel able to.”

The couple were suing landowners RC Tinsley Ltd and Nicholas Watts, as well as Fenland Windfarms Ltd and Fenland Green Power Co-operative Ltd, who own and operate the eight-turbine windfarm.

The legal bid was thought to be the first private noise nuisance case of its kind and was being heralded as an important test case.

Witnesses had given statements to the High Court over three weeks in July, but it was adjourned for almost four months.

However, last Tuesday – the day before proceedings were due to recommence – the legal teams for the two parties agreed to a settlement. The details of it are being kept strictly confidential.

The couple are now tentatively preparing for their future, with Jane hoping to return to her job as a nurse in the New Year in an NHS community role, while Julian intends to once again immerse himself into farm life.

They are also planning their first traditional Christmas since 2005 – with simple pleasures such as writing Christmas cards having previously passed them by due to worries about their legal fight.

The Davis family intend to “sit tight” in their rented home in Mayfair Drive, Spalding, for the time being. A decision is still to be made on whether their farmhouse in North Drove Bank, Spalding, could be exempt from council tax in the future.

“This has been worse than fighting cancer,” said Jane. “With cancer, all of the professionals are on your side and in the first year of this, in 2006/07, we felt we were up against a brick wall. In 2007 a noise report came out and it said the problems we were having did exist.

“It’s been very hard and has done a huge amount of damage to us in the last five years. On the plus side, we have met new people, been to come amazing places and met some pretty amazing contacts both here and abroad.”

While the case has not produced a formal decision on whether there is a noise nuisance in Deeping St Nicholas, Jane and Julian believe their plight has made a difference on an international scale.

Julian (46) explained: “The goal always was to reach our own solution but on the way through it has helped a lot.”

Jane added: “There is greater recognition that wind turbines can cause noise. Even if there had been a decision in court, it would have been a very specific, case-related decision. Renewables UK has invested and is continuing to invest in a significant research project.”

Jane says Defra has since introduced policy relating to wind turbines.

Source:  By SHARON PELL, Spalding Guardian, www.spaldingtoday.co.uk 6 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.