LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm inquiries are ignoring local concerns 

Credit:  The Telegraph, www.telegraph.co.uk 4 December 2011 ~~

The proposed wind farm at Nun Wood is even worse than Tim Coles (Letters, November 27) imagines. We own a farm next to the site of the turbines, one of which will be situated, according to Wellingborough council, 45ft from the boundary hedge of one of our fields.

As the turbine blades are 135ft in length, we could have 90ft of the blade over-sailing our land. I raised this issue at the public inquiry, but there is no mention of it in the inspector’s report. I also raised the danger of ice shearing off blades during cold weather but, again, there is no mention of that in the report.

The threat to wildlife was raised by the Northamptonshire Bat Group, the Berks, Bucks and Oxon (BBO) Wildlife Trust and myself. In fact, the BBO Wildlife Trust objected because the scheme did not meet guidelines laid down by Natural England which state that no part of a turbine should be within 150ft of a “linear feature” – for example, a hedge – so as to protect bats.

This was acknowledged in the report by a vague reference to protection for flora and fauna, but nothing more specific.

Therefore we face the prospect of a 375ft-high wind turbine over our boundary for the next 25 years, with a sizeable area of our own land out of bounds during the winter months for reasons of health and safety and no protection for wildlife.

Will Green
Bozeat, Northamptonshire

Source:  The Telegraph, www.telegraph.co.uk 4 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky