[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

LURC better on wind  

Credit:  Bangor Daily News, bangordailynews.com 1 December 2011 ~~

In reading the Nov. 26 Bangor Daily News editorial “A better LURC is close,” one must ask, “Better for whom?”

Certainly, for those of us living in LURC’s jurisdiction, there is nothing “better” about the prospect of the Maine DEP becoming the sole siting authority for all wind turbine developments in the state. Just when we thought the wind development nightmare in rural Maine couldn’t get any worse, we find out that it could.

The DEP has twice allowed wind developers to begin construction without demonstrating the financial capacity to complete their projects, something required by law. It has never allowed public comment on a wind project in a formal public hearing. It has never denied a grid-scale wind development permit. Most disturbingly, it has never enforced the state’s noise regulations when a wind development was shown to be out of compliance.

It seems it would be more cost-effective to not even review wind permit applications in Maine – the outcome wouldn’t be much different than the DEP’s.

Between Maine’s two current wind project siting agencies, the LURC commissioners have shown far greater insight into wind development review than the DEP. If they’re going to hand project review to one or the other, give it to LURC. The DEP is doing little more than rubber-stamping wind development permits.

DEP review of wind projects might be a wind developer’s dream, but it’s a nightmare if you live in the LURC jurisdiction.

Kay Michka

Lexington Township

Source:  Bangor Daily News, bangordailynews.com 1 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter