[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

It’s not the end for wind farm: company  

Credit:  Alex Fensome, The Southland Times, 24 November 2011 ~~

The Bluff Community Board’s decision not to back the Flat Hill wind farm is not the end of the road for the project, the company behind it says.

Canterbury company Energy3 planned to build eight turbines on Flat Hill, near Bluff, and filed for consent with the Invercargill City Council this month.

However, board members have come out against the proposal and formally submitted against it.

They cited its proximity to Green Point cemetery as culturally offensive, said the turbines could cause problems for muttonbirds and could affect drivers, with the shadows falling across State Highway 1.

They were also concerned about the potential for the site to expand.

Chairman Jan Mitchell said the board was not against wind farms, but was against the Flat Hill site.

There were 10 valid issues outlined in the submission, she said.

“We were concerned eight [turbines] could grow with little or no input from the community.”

Energy3 director Warren McNabb said the decision was a setback but was not causing him concern. “I’ve seen a copy of their submission and I think some of the issues are fairly easy to deal with,” he said. “We are looking forward to working through these issues with them.”

The wind farm would be worth about $15 million and provide 7 megawatts of electricity.

Board member Brent Procter said he felt there was a consensus against the proposal.

“One of the main problems is it’s going to be highly visible from Bluff,” he said.

Asked if there was an element of “not in my backyard”, Mr Procter said he thought it was always there with wind farms.

“Our objections wouldn’t differ very much to wind farms anywhere.”

If Energy3 had picked a less conspicuous site, it might have got the board’s support, he said.

“I think they couldn’t picked a worse spot.”

Expansion of the site would be difficult to stop, he said. “Wind farms have a habit of expanding.”

Puysegur Point in Fiordland would be a better place for a wind farm, he joked.

Submissions are open until tomorrow.

Source:  Alex Fensome, The Southland Times, 24 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.