Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind company resubmits turbine plans at Eye Airfield
Credit: Eastern Daily Press, www.edp24.co.uk 23 November 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
An application for two 130-metre high wind turbines has been resubmitted after progress stalled earlier in the year.
Plans for two wind turbines at the Eye Airfield industrial estate, near Diss, have been sent to Mid Suffolk District Council.
It comes after previous proposals were withdrawn by Wind Power Renewables following objections from the Ministry of Defence and Norwich International Airport because of concerns over the impact on air traffic and radar.
Managing director Andy Hilton said they had resubmitted the plans to the district council after the two objections were dropped.
Mr Hilton added: “This cost us thousands of pounds and several months in delays. The process was stopped as objectors were asking for changes to the plans.”
“We would like to think that the application will go through, it should have gone through last time. Hopefully we will not have any objections this time.”
The two mega watt turbines have the potential to provide the energy needs for 3,800 homes for the next 25 years.
Wind Power Renewables Ltd committed itself to a community fund which will receive an annual top-up of typically £1,000 per installed megawatt.
The Eye project is expected to receive over £6,000 per annum, which will total over £150,000 over 25 years.
However, there are still concerns. Eye town councillor, Andrew Evitt said: “The wind turbines are going to be four and a half times the height of the town’s church.
“The effect will be the biggest intrusion on the land since the Ice Age. To say that everyone was for the wind turbines is absolute rubbish. The cost of wind power is just staggering.”
A spokesman for Mid Suffolk District Council said: “The council has received a planning application for two wind turbines in Eye Airfield and a decision will be made in the New Year.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: