[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Go to multi-category search »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Polegate town authority ‘vehemently’ opposes wind farm  

Credit:  Sussex Express, www.sussexexpress.co.uk 21 November 2011 ~~

A wind farm development involving five turbines has been ‘vehemently’ opposed by a town authority.

Regeneco wants to erect five wind turbines on land off Shepham Lane, north of the A27 near Polegate.

The Sussex Express has reported a mixed reaction from some residents about the plans.

But Polegate Town Council has put in an official objection against the proposal following a public meeting on November 1.

In a letter to Kelvin Williams, Wealden head of planning, Polegate Town Council said it ‘resolved to vehemently oppose the application’.

The letter added: “The decision was unanimous and both public and councillors present at the meeting were all opposed.”

Objections raised by residents who spoke at the meeting included: wildlife concerns, noise from the turbines, the closeness to residents’ homes, and the visual aspect of the turbines.

Cllrs Gerald Carter, Tim and Jill Voyce commented officially with Cllr Jill Voyce saying the consultees listed by the district council, including nine town or parish councils, ‘demonstrates just how far reaching the impact of this proposal will be’.

She added: “This application is unusual in the extreme. It is impossible to consider its suitability strictly within the usual planning criteria.”

Concerns were given by the councillors about the visual impact and the ‘subjective opinion of [Regeneco] that the five proposed wind turbines will not cause significant harm’.

Comments on the plans can be sent to Wealden District Council until November 29.

Source:  Sussex Express, www.sussexexpress.co.uk 21 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.