[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Support for Prince Philip’s anti-wind farm stance 

Credit:  by Paul Tully, The Journal, www.journallive.co.uk 21 November 2011 ~~

Anti-wind farm campaigners in the North East last night welcomed fierce criticism of the turbines by the Duke of Edinburgh.

In a blistering attack on the rising tide of wind turbine developments, the Duke described wind farms as “useless” and “a disgrace”.

Prince Philip rapped the onshore wind turbine industry’s reliance upon electricity customers’ subsidies.

In comments that put him firmly against Government policy in favour of wind energy developments, the Duke said wind farms could “never work” and claimed those who supported them were living a “fairy-tale”.

Leading environmentalist Dr David Bellamy led the praise for the outspoken Duke for putting forward his influential viewpoint.

Dr Bellamy, 78, who lives in Weardale, told The Journal: “I heartily agree with everything the Duke of Edinburgh says. The prince is outspoken – but 99.9% of times he is saying the right thing.

“Wind farms are sacrilege in our beautiful countryside. I have written personally to Prince Philip today thanking him for what he has said.

“It adds strength to our case and the fight against the monstrosity of wind farms, which in Northumberland have now become a major issue.”

Last month, Energy Secretary Chris Huhne stirred controversy on a visit to Newcastle by describing wind turbines as “elegant” and “beautiful”, and criticising opponents.

The Duke’s views became public following a conversation with Esbjorn Wilmar, managing director of leading wind energy firm Infinerg, who was quoted in a Sunday newspaper.

“He said they were absolutely useless, completely reliant on subsidies and an absolute disgrace,” Mr Wilmar revealed. “I was surprised by his very frank views.”

The Duke’s assertion that wind turbines need back-up capacity because of their unreliability was echoed by Georgina Leyland of the Middleton Burn Action Group in Northumberland, which is currently fighting a wind farm application near Elsdon.

Mrs Leyland declared: “They are unpredictable, inefficient and erratic. What the Duke has said is incredibly positive and I hope it triggers an urgent, immediate discussion with the real facts.

“Everyone who knows anything about wind turbines knows they are a complete scam and the country cannot afford to carry on with such a waste of time.

“Wind turbines cause terrible problems for the grid because they surge and then un-surge.

“I think Prince Philip speaks for thousands of us who love this country. We are destroying our country for nothing at all.”

It is estimated that electricity customers are paying an average £90 a year to subsidise wind farms and other forms of renewable energy under Government carbon-reduction targets.

The Duke’s comments echo those of his son, the Prince of Wales, who has refused to have any wind farms built on Duchy of Cornwall land.

Two-thirds of the UK’s 3,000-plus turbines are owned by foreign companies, which take an estimated £500m a year in subsidies.

Scandinavian Jens Rasmussen, chief executive of London-based Air Farmers Ltd, which is seeking to build 16 125-metre turbines at Middleton Burn, last night said he would not get involved in what had become a political argument.

“Policy is generally a political matter,” he said, “and I have no interest in commenting on that, or what the Duke of Edinburgh has said.

“We are a commercial organisation – we are not political.”

Source:  by Paul Tully, The Journal, www.journallive.co.uk 21 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky