[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Farmer warns wind farm fight not over  

Credit:  Anelia Blackie, The Border Watch, www.borderwatch.com.au 16 November 2011 ~~

Eight Mile Creek farmer Richard Paltridge has vowed to continue his fight against the wind farm development near his property, despite “undemocratic” proposed changes to the state’s development plan on wind farms.

Mr Paltridge has spent well over $100,000 in legal fees to overturn the approval of the development in the Environment, Resources and Development Court.

However, the proposed changes by the government, which include denying people the right to appeal against approved wind farm developments, appear set to overrule the court’s decision to halt the development, once changes are made to the plan.

Wind farm developer Acciona Energy will lodge a new application for the wind farm to go ahead under the proposed changes.

But Mr Paltridge said it was undemocratic to deny people the right to appeal against wind farm developments.

“It is undemocratic and what you would expect from a dictatorship,” he said.

“It is completely improper for a government to seek to overturn the very detailed and considered opinion of the specialist ERD Court on the visual impact of this wind farm.

“I will take whatever steps necessary to overturn any unfavourable decision, including challenging the matter by way of judicial review proceedings in the Supreme Court.

“I will challenge the validity of the development plan amendment, together with any further action that my family and I might be advised to take.”

Mr Paltridge said he was also opposed to the new proposed distances of 1km between turbines and dwellings and 2km between turbines and townships.

“In my particular instance, the nearest turbine would be 850m away,” he said.

“An additional 150m away will not have a substantial decrease in the visual impact of the wind farm – the same comment applies to a number of other dwellings which are sited from as little as 750m away from the nearest turbines to a little over 1km away.”

Mr Paltridge said the development plan amendments were inconsistent with the expert finding of the ERD Court that the wind farm should not be established at Allendale East and Eight Mile Creek because of its visual impact.

“No development plan deeming provision can overcome that express finding,” he said.

“In my opinion, the development plan amendment should immediately be revoked.”

Although very disappointed by the proposed changes, Mr Paltridge said it came as no surprise as the ruling of the ERD Court against the development was mentioned in parliament the following day.

“It indicated that the (former) Premier (Mike Rann) was looking at ways to ‘overcome’ the effect of the ERD Court decision,” he said.

Shortly after, Acciona lodged an appeal to the Supreme Court, but when no further action was taken, Mr Paltridge became increasingly concerned.

“I believe something was happening behind closed doors,” he said.

“Not surprisingly, on October 19, the day before Mr Rann completed his term as premier, the government gazetted a statewide development plan amendment dealing with wind farms – the effect of the plan will be catastrophic as far as I am concerned.”

Source:  Anelia Blackie, The Border Watch, www.borderwatch.com.au 16 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.