Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind turbine hearing postponed to January
Credit: By ROBERT BARBOZA, Editor, www.southcoasttoday.com 9 November 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
DARTMOUTH – A public hearing on Thomas and Susan Kirby’s application for a special permit to erect a wind turbine on a 50-meter tower at 264 Smith Neck Road was postponed until Jan. 9 by the Select Board Monday night.
Town officials said the application filed by Kirby is incomplete, and fails to meet the guidelines established by the town’s commercial wind turbine zoning bylaw.
At the start of Monday night’s public hearing, Mr. Kirby requested a continuance, saying he needed more time “so I can figure out what my options are” and submit a revised application.
With an audience of more than 40 concerned residents in the meeting room, town officials were pressed for details on why the hearing was being postponed.
Executive Administrator David Cressman said the current application, for a turbine atop a 50-meter tower, lacks a business plan and fails to meet setbacks required by the town’s turbine bylaw.
He suggested a revised application propose “either a 40-meter tower or something else that meets the town’s zoning bylaw.” The town’s Technical Review Group (TRG) has also recommended a noise study be conducted, he indicated.
Select Board member Lara Stone, the board’s representative on the TRG, confirmed that the advisory group had requested a noise impact study be conducted as part of a peer review of the project. She said the TRG did not vote to recommend the application after a recent meeting, suggesting “there is not enough information right now for us to make a recommendation.”
Stone urged the Kirbys to accept the offer of a neighborhood group to pay for half of a new acoustic impact study.
She said the TRG will meet again before the Jan. 9 public hearing to review changes to the plans, and finalize its recommendation to the Select Board, the special permit granting authority under the turbine bylaw.
Select Board Chairman Michael Watson asked Mr. Kirby to submit the revised application by Dec. 16 so that the TRG and the Select Board will have time to review the new information before the public hearing.
Attorney Christopher Senie, representing a group of neighbors, told the Select Board that the continuance “is a very good idea” because the plans weren’t ready for a public hearing.
He said his clients’ offer to pay for a more comprehensive noise study comes with no strings attached. “We would have no say in who does the peer review,” he indicated, noting the TRG has the right to select the independent consultants needed.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Paypal) |
(via Stripe) |
Share: