[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind energy debate shifts to Ogden and Palmyra townships  

Credit:  By Erik Gable, Daily Telegram, www.lenconnect.com 10 November 2011 ~~

ADRIAN, Mich. – With the approval in Riga Township of a wind turbine ordinance that wind power supporters say effectively bans turbines in the township, the wind energy debate now shifts to Ogden and Palmyra townships.

In Ogden Township, which does not have zoning, the township board will be discussing a police powers ordinance to regulate turbines. In Palmyra Township, where the township board recently passed an ordinance that would allow wind energy development, supporters of stricter rules will try to overturn the township board’s ordinance through a referendum in February.

Tuesday’s election results essentially take Riga Township off the table for the Blissfield Wind Energy Project, said Doug Duimering, a project manager with Exelon Wind, one of the partners in the project.

“We don’t have a way to put turbines in Riga Township right now,” he said. “The ordinance is extraordinarily restrictive.”

The ordinance requires turbines to be no less than four times their own height from non-participating properties and limits noise levels to 40 decibels between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. and 45 decibels between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

While members of the Blissfield project are disappointed with the outcome of the Riga vote, Duimering said, the group is looking ahead to discussions with the Ogden Township board. He extended congratulations to supervisor Richard Marks and clerk Alice Clark, who were elected Tuesday to the seats they had been appointed to fill after the previous supervisor and clerk were recalled.
“We’re looking forward to working with the board to discuss the future of wind development in Ogden Township,” Duimering said.

Both Marks and Clark were supported by the Interstate Informed Citizens Coalition, the group that has been working against wind developers’ plans in the area.

A spokesman for juwi Wind, another wind power company, said juwi is evaluating its options after the election.

“We would like to thank the voters and all those in favor of wind energy in Riga Township,” said Aaron Peterson, manager of community relations and regulatory affairs for juwi Wind. “We are disappointed that the vote indicates the community did not support wind energy and its economic benefits. There was a significant amount of misinformation spread throughout the community during the referendum process. We will continue to evaluate project development options.”

Paul Wohlfarth, president of Riga Residents for Wind, said that with the results of Tuesday’s vote, he believes the township will see its revenue situation worsen and residents can look forward to future millage requests to repair roads.

“Without economic development we all suffer from lower property values, higher unemployment and higher taxes,” he said.

In Palmyra Township, meanwhile, turbine opponents have taken the first step toward trying to overturn the township’s wind ordinance at the ballot box.

Kevon Martis, a director of the IICC, said Laura Van Camp of Palmyra Township delivered a notice of intent to the township clerk on Tuesday.

Martis said the plan is to gather signatures for a referendum on Feb. 28 – unless the board reverses its position and enacts a stricter ordinance, which he said he doesn’t think will happen.

“I think it will have to be tossed by referendum to get there,” he said.

As in Tuesday’s Riga Township election, voters would be deciding whether to uphold the township board’s ordinance or overturn it. However, Martis said, the wording of the initiative, including whether a yes vote is to keep the ordinance or to overturn it, will be at the board’s discretion.

Martis said his group isn’t against turbines but feels the setbacks proposed by wind companies aren’t enough. Turbines on the proposed scale are more suited to areas with less population density, he argued.

“It’s our opinion that 500-foot turbines are like trying to squeeze a size 12 foot into a size 8 shoe,” Martis said.

Source:  By Erik Gable, Daily Telegram, www.lenconnect.com 10 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.