[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Municipal utilities feeling burned; Towns see none of funds from energy projects 

Credit:  BY AMY DeMELIA SUN CHRONICLE STAFF, Friday, November 11, 2011 2:12 AM EST, www.thesunchronicle.com 11 November 2011 ~~

North Attleboro and Mansfield municipal electric departments each collect about $55,000 a year from their customers for a fund that pays for energy efficiency projects, but not a penny of it comes back to the towns.

And they are not alone.

Municipal electric departments across the state are raising concerns they are not eligible to receive the money that comes out of their customers’ bills.

Electricity generators collect a small fee from electric companies for every kilowatt hour of power that is used, which ultimately goes to pay for energy efficiency and conservation projects.

The charge, which is passed on from electric companies to their customers, makes up a tiny portion of each electric bill, but adds up to big money. While private utility companies receive some of that energy efficiency money, municipal utilities are not eligible, even though their customers pay the charge, just like private utility customers do.

“None of the money collected is actually coming back to municipal electric departments,” said James Moynihan, general manager of North Attleboro Electric. “The municipal electric companies make up about 12 to 13 percent of the total load in the commonwealth, so 12 to 13 percent of these funds should go the municipal electric companies.”

Several bills filed in the state Legislature are looking to do just that by changing the law to allow municipal electric departments to receive the energy efficiency money collected from its customers.

“We are concerned about this because the money should be coming back to our customers to pay for energy conservation. None of the 41 municipal light plants are getting that money,” said Gary Babin, director of Mansfield Municipal Electric. “We’re hoping the legislation will change that.”

The energy efficiency funds are collected as part of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a program that runs in 10 Northeastern and mid-Atlantic states.

The program, known in the industry as “Reggie” due to its initials, is a cap and trade program designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. The initiative puts a cap on the emissions of carbon dioxide and issues permits, known as allowances, for each ton of carbon dioxide that a power plant emits. To encourage conservation, power plants that cut their emissions can trade or sell their extra allowances at auctions.

In addition, electric companies pay power generators .00025 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity they receive, which amounts to around $55,000 a year in both North Attleboro and Mansfield – and millions across the 10 member states.

The Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources receives 20 percent of the “Reggie” money. The remaining 80 percent is dedicated for energy renewal and conservation projects.

While private utilities receive “Reggie” money, municipal utilities cannot under the current law.

There are several bills pending in the state Legislature that would change that by allowing municipal electric companies to receive the money collected from its customers.

The bills, all filed in January, are before the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

If North Attleboro Electric received the money, it would be used to enhance energy efficiency programs already in place, such as energy audits and rebate programs, Moynihan said.

Mansfield Municipal Electric would also look into expanding its programs if one of the bills is approved by the Legislature.

“We would ask the light commissioners if they would be willing to adopt conservation programs. We have a few smaller programs like energy rebates and energy audits, but we could do a widespread conservation plan if we had the money to support it,” Babin said.

Source:  BY AMY DeMELIA SUN CHRONICLE STAFF, Friday, November 11, 2011 2:12 AM EST, www.thesunchronicle.com 11 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon