LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ruining our beauty 

Credit:  The Recorder, 3 November 2011 ~~

I read with great interest the Oct. 25, My Turn article titled “We deserve answers.” I do not know who Deborah Andrew is, but I could not agree more with her article.

I have lived in Shelburne all of my life. I have hiked Mount Massaemet and the High Ledges through out my life. When my wife and I moved from the Falls to Shelburne Center, we did so for the aesthetic beauty of the surrounding landscape. The road I live on parallels Little Mohawk Road, and we are just down from the Patton district. To widen these serene country roads would forever destroy the aesthetic beauty of the area. It would be a crime to rape the top of this beautiful scenic vista to install eight 465-foot-tall wind turbines that will not only not supply the Shelburne Falls area with power, but will create a massive footprint to the area that, in my opinion, will not be offset by any benefits from the proposed wind turbines.

The proponents for this project say that the seven wind turbines will produce 2.5 MWs of electricity. That is at an optimum wind speed. It is not a sustained 2.5 MWs. The area in question is very close to the National Audubon Society’s sanctuary. Not a real good deal for the birds! I do not think Ellsworth or Mary Barnard would have approved.

Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Japan, Ireland, Australia all have withdrawn from this type of renewable energy. Why? If this makes me a NIMBY, so be it. I look to the greater good for our community.

As Deborah Andrew did, I also suggest people attend public hearing held at Memorial Hall on Nov. 17 at 7:30 p.m.

PHILLIP TEDESCO III

Source:  The Recorder, 3 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky