[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Govt to counter wind resistance  

Credit:  By Malcolm Sutton, Stock Journal, sj.farmonline.com.au 31 October 2011 ~~

A dairy farmer’s blockade of a proposed wind farm in the Lower South East has triggered an aggressive response from the State Government.

Richard Paltridge, Eight Mile Creek, successfully won his appeal against the District Council of Grant in June after it had given approval to a $175-million, 46-turbine wind farm development.

The Environmental Resources and Development Court overturned the council’s decision that led to the State Government last week releasing a proposed Ministerial Development Plan Amendment, which sets guidelines for wind farms in SA. It is designed to prevent third parties, such as Mr Paltridge, appealing against wind farm developments.

Mr Paltridge had argued there would be noise and health issues as a result of the turbines’ close proximity to his home.

More than one of them would have been 870 metres north of his house. He was also concerned about milking 700 Friesian cross cows adjacent to the proposed wind farm in a newly built, fully robotic dairy.

Mr Paltridge had said the value of his land would drop.

“When wind farms go up along- side you, it devalues the land by 30 per cent to 40pc,” he said.

“I’ve just installed a completely robotic dairy. It was very expensive and that’s why I’m so upset about the wind farm.”

Mr Paltridge said landholders were paid well to have turbines installed on their property, but a lot of them did not live on-property. “And many of them say they wouldn’t want to either,” he said.

Judge Jack Costello, from the ERDC, rejected Mr Paltridge’s health concerns, but instead set a precedent by upholding the plaintiff’s other argument that turbines would detract from the region’s character and amenity.

Mr Costello said the area was unlike other large and sparsely populated regions of the State because there were “numerous” agricultural enterprises under way that were “modest in size”.

Source:  By Malcolm Sutton, Stock Journal, sj.farmonline.com.au 31 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.