[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm planners tell Richfield Springs another hearing not necessary  

Credit:  By JOE MAHONEY, Staff Writer, thedailystar.com 25 October 2011 ~~

RICHFIELD SPRINGS – An attorney for a company seeking to erect a wind farm on both sides of Route 20 advised the Richfield Town Planning Board Monday night that it is not required to hold an additional public hearing on the project.

Doug Ward, the lawyer for Ridgeline Energy of Albany, said that under the state Environmental Quality Review Act, a second public forum on the proposed six-turbine wind generation project isn’t necessary. The board held one hearing on the project – in July.

Ward later told The Daily Star he was not advocating one way or another on whether the public should be allowed to sound off again.

“It’s their decision,” he said of the board. “It’s not something the law requires.”

The Planning Board agreed to extend for 30 days its review of the company’s application for a special-use permit needed to build the development on a site consisting of approximately 1,190 acres of land in the northwestern section of the Town of Richfield.

A project foe, Douglas Zamelis, a lawyer who resides in nearby Springfield, suggested Ridgeline Energy is trying to ram the project forward without being required by the planning board to produce a time-consuming environmental impact statement.

“They want to get this approved as soon as possible,” Zamelis said. “If the planning board does not require the applicant to complete an environmental impact statement, all they are really doing is cutting the public out of the process. I can see the potential for lawsuits.”

Walt Kalina, a consultant to the planning board, said that the project has drawn a wide range of comments from citizens, many of whom wrote to say they support it.

Kalina and one of the board members, Cynthia Andela, met last week with a leading opponent of wind farms, Jonathan Knauth, who argues wind power is among the most expensive forms of energy.

Kalina advised the board those issues are outside the scope of its evaluation.

“I don’t believe we’re in a position to decide energy policy,” he said.

The company said it hopes to switch on the six 492-foot turbines by late 2012. All told, they’d have a generating capacity of 18.45 megawatts.

Source:  By JOE MAHONEY, Staff Writer, thedailystar.com 25 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.