[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

No decision on air traffic control plans  

Credit:  By Paul Cook, The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 21 October 2011 ~~

Airport bosses have yet to make a decision on where its air traffic control will be based after agreeing on an improved safety system allowing a wind farm to be built.

The Banks Group reached agreement with Durham Tees Valley Airport for a radar system that enabled councillors to pass plans for six turbines at Barmpton, near Darlington, five miles from the airport.

Experts from the airport had initially “strongly objected” to Banks’ proposals for the wind farm on safety grounds, saying that the turbines would “penetrate its safeguarded surfaces”, would be visible to radar and could distract and confuse air traffic controllers.

But continued discussions between the two parties enabled the airport to withdraw those reservations.

Justin Hancock, development planner at Banks Renewables, revealed at Wednesday’s planning committee that Banks would be likely to pay for a radar system. As part of conditions imposed by the committee, work will not be allowed to start until the airport is satisfied.

One objector at the meeting, John Rankin, who has worked in air traffic control at the airport for 32 years, raised concerns about the airport’s Uturn.

He was also worried that the decision may see the air traffic control move from Durham Tees Valley to Liverpool, another of Peel Airport’s airports, with the potential loss of up to eight jobs.

A spokesman said Liverpool already ran air traffic control for Peel’s third airport at Doncaster, but no decision has yet been made at Durham Tees Valley. He said: “It is up to the developer to agree with ourselves the best solution to mitigate impacts on the airport’s radar and no decision has been made to date on this matter.”

Objectors living between the airport and the wind farm were also concerned about safety and called on officials to issue a public statement.

The spokesman added: “Safety is always the airport’s highest priority and the wind farm will not become operational until the airport is satisfied that it has no impact on its aviation-related activity.”

Source:  By Paul Cook, The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 21 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.