[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Protesters defeat wind turbine plan  

Credit:  By Andrew Clarke, The Whitehaven News, www.whitehavennews.co.uk 20 October 2011 ~~

People power has emerged victorious after controversial plans for a wind turbine on farmland near Egremont were turned down.

The plans for a single turbine on land at High Thorney, Carleton, have been meet with strong local opposition since it they were first put forward.

And members of Copeland Council’s planning panel refused permission for the turbine at their meeting on Wednesday last week.

Over 240 letters of objection and a 40-signature petition were sent to Copeland Council from residents concerned about a number of issues, including visual impact and noise.

Haile Parish Council also objected, calling the height of the turbine “monstrous”.

Councillor John Jackson told the planning meeting: “This turbine is essentially an industrial building. How can we let it be built on a greenfield site?”

Councillor Yvonne Clarkson, speaking for the Beckermet ward, raised objections on behalf of her community. She said: “This would severely infringe on the lives of people who live there.”

Fellow objector Malcolm Broach pleaded with the councillors: “Don’t destroy our countryside with this metal monster.”

He added: “There is no community benefit to the turbine. It would have an adverse effect on our wildlife and would be a scar on our landscape.”

The applicant, Robert Sherwen, did not attend the meeting. His plans were for a single turbine with a total height, including blades, of 79.6 metres. The turbine would have reduced the farm’s financial overheads and reduce carbon emissions.

Councillors, who visited the site, agreed with officers that the turbine “would be an isolated, prominent feature, incongruous in its surroundings, which would have a materially harmful effect on the character and appearance in the surrounding rural landscape”.

Source:  By Andrew Clarke, The Whitehaven News, www.whitehavennews.co.uk 20 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.