| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Airport’s concerns may block wind farm
Credit: The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 13 October 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Safety concerns about an airport’s radar system are likely to ground a green energy company’s second bid to build a wind farm.
Banks Renewables’ bid to build six wind turbines at Barmpton, north-east of Darlington, is expected to be rejected at a planning meeting next week unless discussions between the firm and Durham Tees Valley Airport officials allay safety fears.
Planning officers at Darlington Borough Council have prepared two recommendations for Banks’ plans for the wind farm at Moor House, depending on the results of the talks.
The planning brief which has been prepared for the meeting said that if the airport maintained its objections, officers could not recommend approval. An alternative recommendation to approve the scheme with 32 individual conditions has also been drafted because the applicants are “hopeful” that ongoing discussions would enable the airport to remove its objection.
The airport has “strongly objected” to the application.
Its statement to the council said: “We have assessed the details and our calculations show that, at the given positions and heights, all six of the wind turbines will penetrate Durham Tees Valley Airport’s safeguarded surfaces.
“It poses an increased safety risk to aircraft operating within the vicinity of the aerodrome. We can also confirm that the rotation of the wind turbine blades within this development would be detected by Durham Tees Valley Airport’s primary radar, creating clutter in the form of twinkling or the formation of tracks on the screen.
“This effect can be highly distracting for a controller and cause confusion when trying to distinguish between real aircraft and false targets.
As a result, the safe operation of the airport would be seriously compromised.”
Phil Dyke, development director of Banks Renewables, said: “We believe that our original plans are acceptable and were obviously very disappointed with the rejection of these proposals, especially as they were recommended for approval.
“But having looked carefully at our design options, we believe the new proposal addresses the concerns that were raised at the original planning committee meeting.”
Councillor Brian Jones, in whose ward the application lies, has maintained his objections since the application was first made, principally because of any safety implications at the airport.
He said yesterday: “A s long as the airport’s objection stands, there is no way the application can be approved. It would be far too dangerous for anything else.We cannot take any chances.”
The meeting will take place in the town hall committee rooms on Wednesday at 1.30pm. It is open to the public.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=14257 ]
