[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

D300’s plan to build wind farm gone with the wind  

Credit:  By Emily McFarlan, The Courier-News, couriernews.suntimes.com 11 October 2011 ~~

ALGONQUIN – It wasn’t supposed to be complicated once it got going. At least, that’s what Community Unit School District 300 CFO Cheryl Crates said more than a year ago.

But then, the Carpentersville-area school district also was supposed to own 13 wind turbines – enough to operate a 19.5-megawatt wind farm – by the end of last year.

The District 300 Board of Education discussed a resolution Monday to revive its plan to offset the cost of its electricity use with its share of revenue from a school wind farm consortium with two other suburban school districts.

“It isn’t quite what we thought we would do, but, in the end, there is no up-front cost,” Crates said.

The school board had approved an intergovernmental agreement in August 2010 to form the School Wind Consortium Agency with Keeneyville Elementary School District 20 and Prospect Heights School District 23.

That was supposed to be the final piece to allow the three districts to fund and operate the state’s first school district-owned wind farm. That farm was planned for Stark County.

But the consortium was unable to garner any interest in a revenue bond to fund the project from investors, according to a memorandum from Crates to District 300 Superintendent Michael Bregy. So it issued a request for proposals in July.

The School Wind Consortium now is discussing entering into a 20-year purchase agreement of renewable energy with Chicago-based Invenergy LLC, after interviewing seven respondents.

“We’re not building anymore. All we’re saying is we’ll buy green energy at this year’s price,” Crates said.

“We’ll be green, we’ll educate the students, and we’ll pay less.”

The company has proposed constructing an addition onto its 270-megawatt Bishop Hill facility in Henry County, about 120 miles southwest of District 300. That probably would be four or five turbines, Crates said.

The addition of those turbines would take about a year to complete and would be operational no later than Dec. 31, 2012, according to the memorandum. That way the project still will qualify for federal grant money, covering about a third of the cost of constructing the turbines, the CFO said.

“That’s why our electricity rate will be lower,” she said.

District 300’s consultants have said the agreement would save consortium members a projected $7 million, according to Crates. And the district has more than a 90 percent share in the potential savings – about $6.3 million, according to Dave Ulm, the district’s energy coordinator.

Mike Tennis, a Sleepy Hollow resident, questioned that agreement in the meeting’s one public comment.

“From my perspective, this project is outside the core competency of District 300. Your core competency is education, not operating an energy-for-profit endeavor,” Tennis said.

The three school boards involved in the consortium are set to vote this month to authorize the agreement between the School Wind Consortium and Invenergy. District 300 will do so at its next regular board meeting on Monday, Oct. 24.

Source:  By Emily McFarlan, The Courier-News, couriernews.suntimes.com 11 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.