[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Board to Jenne: get the answers on wind project  

Credit:  By Laura Carpenter, The Newport Daily Express, newportvermontdailyexpress.com 9 October 2011 ~~

DERBY – Derby Selectman Karen Jenne would like official public hearings held in Derby regarding the proposed 425-foot turbines for the rolling hills of Derby Line near Holland. Grand View Farm and the Smugglers Hill Farm want to host the industrial sized turbines and earn a payment in return. Derby turbines were an agenda item for Monday’s select board meeting last week.
The suggestion was made by Jenne as the developers are seeking a positive recommendation from the town to present to the public Service Board (PSB). Developer Encore Redevelopment, has provided an official 45-day notice for town approval prior to submitting an application to the PSB for a Certificate of Public Good. Select board member Laura Dolgin said that she did not want to go through similar heated conversations that took place regarding Vermont Electric Company’s (VELCO) proposal for cell towers.
VELCO sought a positive recommendation from the town for a telecommunications tower and no official public hearings were ever held on the issue, leading to outrage among some community members. There were, however, a number of heated and lengthy conversations that took place during regularly scheduled select board meetings between concerned citizens and Derby officials from both the select board and the planning commission.
Select board Chairman Brian Smith noted that public meetings have already taken place in Derby Line. During those meeting, the developers talked about what they want to do.
Dolgin pointed out the the town does not have jurisdiction over the project.
The developers are going through a state statute that allows applicants to bypass local permits and apply directly to the PSB. However, any developments are still supposed to meet the Town Plan and Bylaw.
Jenne said that she has many unanswered questions about the project and how it will affect the town.
Jenne said she is hearing from a number of concerned neighbors.
Among the questions that remain unanswered is what Derby will be paid for a tax payment. The developers have promised to negotiate, but it has not happened yet. Developers also said that payments would be negotiated to those in the view shed, which is a 10-mile radius of the project and includes an area north of the Canadian-U.S. border. The proposal would be similar to the Good Neighbor Fund Green Mountain Power proposed for those towns near the Lowell Wind site, the developers said.
Town Lister Sue Best was at the meeting Monday evening and she said there is somewhat of a dilemma on how to determine the tax payment on wind turbines. She said the listers would look into.
Jenne also brought up concerns over water lines on the proposed site and how they would be affected during the construction.
Smith and Dolgin both suggested that Jenne work on getting her questions answered and report back to the board.
Jenne said in a later interview that she is working on arranging official meetings in Derby regarding the proposed project.

Source:  By Laura Carpenter, The Newport Daily Express, newportvermontdailyexpress.com 9 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch