[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Owners want payoff to stop turbine project  

Credit:  By ADELLA HARDING, Free Press Staff Writer, Elko Daily Free Press, elkodaily.com 7 October 2011 ~~

ELKO – An Elko couple whose plan to install a wind turbine on their property along Sundance Drive is offering disgruntled neighbors the chance to pay them not to put up the tower.

“Neighbors can pay for the wind rights,” Travis Gerber, attorney for Scott and Sheri Baker, said at the Elko County Commissioners meeting, after commissioners voted to ask the Elko County Planning Commission to look again at the wind ordinance.

“The Bakers have to eat $6,000” in a nonrefundable payment if they don’t install the turbine, Gerber said, but he added that neighbors could offer the Bakers money in lieu of the wind turbine. “That option is open.”

Installation of the wind turbine would entitle the Bakers to a $26,000 payment from NV Energy toward the $30,000 cost for the project, and the Bakers in turn would sell the power to NV Energy.

“Power would go back to the grid. It would reduce reliance on other energy sources,” Gerber said at the Thursday meeting.

The Bakers received approval from the commissioners in August to install a 66-foot-tall turbine on their two-acre lot after a three-hour hearing, but they later dropped the application, then filed a new one yet to be acted upon.

One of the neighbors, Kevin Sur, was on the agenda to urge commissioners to change the ordinance to limit the placement of wind turbines to sites of 10 acres or more, and he initially talked more generically about the proposal, not naming the Bakers.

“We’re asking for review,” he said, citing issues with a wind turbine in a neighborhood of homes, including the “strobe factor” at night from light reflection on the blades, the noise, the view and potential property devaluation.

He said the threat to property values is like a taking of property.

Attorney Katie McConnell, who represents a group of neighbors, said the county’s wind ordinance is inconsistent.

She said one page states that there is a minimal lot size of 10 acres, including if there is a combination of a smaller, private turbine and a larger one. Another page puts the minimum at one acre for one type of turbine or the other, without the combination.

The one-acre section also eliminates open spaces as one of the zoned areas where a wind turbine can be located.

“You are depriving anyone with less than 10 acres to wind power,” said Commissioner Warren Russell.

“My feeling is we should send this back to the planning commission to relook at it and come back with a recommendation,” Commissioner Jeff Williams said, suggesting a five-acre requirement rather than 10 acres.

Kristin McQueary, Elko County’s chief civil deputy district attorney, said the county’s ordinance on wind power is the first in the state, and the commission put nine months of effort into it.

The new application the Bakers filed falls under the current ordinance, she also told commissioners.

McQueary chided Commissioner Charlie Myers after he asked “why would the Bakers want to alienate their neighbors” by installing the wind turbine. She said he shouldn’t show bias if the new application comes back to commissioners for a hearing again.

Fourteen neighbors signed a petition against the wind turbine after planning commissioners approved the project last June.

Myers made the motion to send the ordinance issue back to the planning panel to specifically look at parcel sizes.

The motion passed 3-1, with Russell voting against it and Commissioner Glen Guttry absent.

Source:  By ADELLA HARDING, Free Press Staff Writer, Elko Daily Free Press, elkodaily.com 7 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.