[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Hammond supervisor candidate plans lawsuit  

Credit:  By JIMMY LAWTON, The Journal, www.ogd.com 7 October 2011 ~~

HAMMOND – Candidate for town supervisor Michele W. McQueer said she fully intends to file an Article 78 lawsuit against the town board for procedural errors made when members passed a local law last year allowing them to act on land use issues with a simple majority vote.

Mrs. McQueer filed a land-based petition opposing the recently passed wind facilities law after the first public hearing held in July.

Without last year’s local law, the board would have needed a super majority vote to proceed with the law due to the petition. However, the law overrules the requirement.

“We knew that we may have a situation coming up, and we have two members who are conflicted and could not vote. We would not be able to act on this or other land use issues requiring a super majority if we did not pass that law,” said Town Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram.

Mrs. McQueer said passing the law was a slap in the face to the petitioners. She said the it was passed only to deny the will of the people.

“We had signatures from people owning over 35 percent of the land (in the town) and more than 85 percent of the land within the wind overlay district,” she said. “They are taking away home rule from land owners.”

Despite her problems with the law itself, Mrs. McQueer said the suit she is filing will target the procedural errors made by the board when enacting law.

Mr. Bertram said the board followed all proper procedures necessary to pass the local law. He said legal notices were issued at Jan. 11 meeting and public hearing was held Jan. 27, the day the town passed the law.

“Our attorney, Joe Russell, was at that meeting and he read the law in its entirety,” he said.

Mr. Bertram questioned the validity of Mrs. McQueer’s claims and said her decision to bring a suit against the town was hypocritical considering her recent criticism of him.

“My opponent took me to task for wasting money on legal fees and spending huge amounts of money, which she incorrectly quoted. Then she turned around and threatened to sue the town herself,” Mr. Bertram said. “I question why she needs to bring a needless lawsuit against us and spend taxpayers’ money.”

Mrs. McQueer said she is concerned about the cost of the lawsuit, but fingered Mr. Bertram as the person responsible for it.

“I offered them a chance to reconsider passing the law at the public hearing, but they chose not to do it. If he is breaking the law, shouldn’t he be held responsible?” she said.

Mrs. McQueer said she is waiting for a copy of the final wind law, and will file the lawsuit against the town board once it is received.

Source:  By JIMMY LAWTON, The Journal, www.ogd.com 7 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.