LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Evidence against First Wind 

Credit:  bangordailynews.com 6 October 2011 ~~

Maine’s Land Use Regulation Commission will debate the Bowers Mountain wind turbine project this week. Citizens spoke out against the project by 2 to 1 at public hearings, according to the BDN. And 90.1 percent of all written comments oppose the project indicating a public groundswell against the permit.

A precedent is already in place to preserve these lakes from destruction of their scenic character. The 1987 Maine Wildlands Lake Assessment published by the Department of Conservation established that several lakes within the viewshed of the project were worthy of “policy” consideration to maintain their natural character.

Pleasant Lake received the highest designation as an “especially high value lake meriting policy consideration to maintain their existing values.” Junior Lake was designated as “meriting policy consideration to maintain their existing values.” Scraggly is one of only five Maine lakes designated as an “especially high value accessible undeveloped lake.”

These rare waters account for only 5 percent of all lake area in Maine yet First Wind contends these lakes are “not unique or distinct, there are no special or defining features.” Nonsense. The public disagrees and so does the opinion of Department of Conservation’s report.

This project will compromise existing views and cause unreasonable damage to the scenic amenity value of this chain of lakes. LURC should heed its charge to “protect natural and ecological values” in Maine and deny First Wind’s permit application. The public has vocally urged it to do so and existing evidence overwhelmingly supports the public’s cry.

Timothy Dalton

Lakeville

Source:  bangordailynews.com 6 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky