LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

North says yes to green jobs, but no to onshore turbines 

Credit:  Richard Moss Political editor, North East & Cumbria, BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 5 October 2011 ~~

There’s been much talk of a green jobs dividend for the North East and Cumbria at the Conservative party conference.

The jobs being created in the offshore wind industry in Tyneside and Teesside were trumpeted early on by Energy minister Charles Hendry.

And he also mentioned the 5,000 jobs which will come to both West Cumbria and Hartlepool when new nuclear power stations are built there.

But some are worried that the region is being asked to make too big a contribution towards the country’s energy needs.

Vocal opponent

In particular, there is concern about the number of applications for onshore wind farms.

Anne-Marie Trevelyan has been a vocal opponent of the string of wind farm developers who want to site turbines in Northumberland.

She is also a Conservative, and fought the parliamentary seat of Berwick at the last election.

But she thinks her party has got its policy on renewable energy badly wrong.

She says there should be more focus on other forms of energy such as biomass.

And she says places like Northumberland have had their fill of wind turbines.

She said: “I think it is fair to say that rural Northumberland is fed up to the teeth with developers turning up and wanting to trash our landscape and our tourism industry.

“The subsidy isn’t going to help local people, it’s going to end up in the pockets of the Danish manufacturer or German investment economy with Northumberland seeing none of the economic benefit.”

Planning battles

Some Cumbrian communities will probably empathise with that sentiment too.

There have been plenty of planning battles there between developers and local campaigners.

Also at the conference was George Beveridge, who is both the deputy managing director of the Sellafield nuclear site and the chairman of the Cumbria Local Enterprise Partnership.

He told me that Cumbria was keen to get its share of any new energy investment.

But he wants to see it principally in offshore wind and nuclear power.

He has welcomed the government’s commitment to a new nuclear power station next to the Sellafield site he manages.

The reprocessing plant will gradually shed workers over the next few decades as it is now being decommissioned.

Unwelcome wind farms

George Beveridge hopes the jobs provided by the new power station and offshore wind farms will offset that.

But he says more onshore wind farms would be less welcome.

The government believes it needs to find as many ways of creating low carbon energy as possible, so won’t call a halt to new onshore wind farms yet.

Ministers have promised to give communities more of a say over where they go, but at the same time their planning reforms will contain a presumption in favour of “sustainable development”.

The government also says wind farms need to go to the windiest parts of the country – and that sounds very like Northumberland, Cumbria and County Durham would still very much be under consideration.

There will be keen competition for jobs in the manufacture of new offshore wind turbines, but some northern communities will prefer to opt out of any suggestion they should be prepared to house more turbines near their homes.

Source:  Richard Moss Political editor, North East & Cumbria, BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 5 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky