LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Alleged damage to eagle nest reopens wind debate in Goodhue County 

Credit:  By Brett Boese, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 5 October 2011 ~~

RED WING – Some critics of the AWA Goodhue wind project in Goodhue County contend that the 32,000-acre project would put wildlife, including bald eagles, in danger.

With a site permit reconsideration hearing at the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission expected in late October, two county residents have signed sworn affidavits that claim an active bald eagle’s nest was intentionally damaged within the project area. Goodhue County Attorney Steve Betcher also presented that information in the county’s PUC filing for permit reconsideration.

Karen Groth, the wife of project critic Steve Groth, says she saw a low-flying helicopter “hazing” the nest with its blades on neighboring property along County 50 Boulevard in rural Zumbrota on Sept. 1. Mary Hartman of Rochester, also a project opponent, says she’d previously viewed the nest and asserts the nest appears to have been significantly damaged.

The incident was reported to Pat Lund of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Sept. 2. Disturbing or destroying a bald eagle’s nest violates a number of federal laws.

The location and number of bald eagle nests in a project area play a role in the siting of turbines. Read about the controversy in Wednesday’s print edition.

Log in to view full story

Source:  By Brett Boese, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 5 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky