Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
U.S. privacy laws also extend to noncitizens
Credit: By Tim Hull, Courthouse News service, www.courthousenews.com 3 October 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A federal law that protects the privacy of emails and other electronic communications extends to foreign nationals, the 9th Circuit ruled Monday, allowing Microsoft to protect the emails of an Indian citizen accused of fraud in Australia.
Indian wind-power company Suzlon Energy wants Microsoft to hand over emails from the Hotmail account of Rajagopalan Sridhar, whom Suzlon is suing for civil fraud in Australia. The energy company has accused Sridhar, who is currently in prison, of diverting profits, transferring company funds to Swiss bank accounts and other financial malfeasance.
A Seattle federal judge initially granted Suzlon’s request but then changed its tune after Microsoft filed a motion to quash. U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman eventually agreed with Microsoft that Sridhar’s email account is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), even though he is foreign citizen.
With a simple reading of the law’s text, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit affirmed unanimously.
At first blush, the case appears to be more complicated than it actually is, according to the panel. But there is nothing in the privacy law to suggest that a U.S. company can ignore its obligations just because a customer is not a citizen.
“While the parties in this case raise issues of international policy, constitutional rights, and the fortuities of the Internet age, this case ultimately turns on the plain language of the relevant statute,” wrote U.S. District Judge Andrew Guilford, sitting on the Seattle-based panel by designation from Santa Ana, Calif.
And that “plain language” says that the ECPA protects “any person.”
“Any person means any person, including foreign citizens,” Guilford wrote. “The court also finds that the statute as a whole confirms that Congress intended the term ‘any person’ to cover noncitizens.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: