[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

PM County board must be more responsive to its constituents  

Credit:  The Bakersfield Californian, www.bakersfield.com 1 October 2011 ~~

The Kern County Board of Supervisors needs to take a closer look at the way it interacts with the public. Many residents are seriously disturbed by this board’s recent inability to listen and respond appropriately to residents’ concerns.

For the Sept. 13 meeting, which began at 2 p.m., the board placed four items on the agenda. Most of 30 or more speakers wanted to address only the final two items on the agenda: the proposed Tehachapi and Jawbone Canyon wind farm projects that impact them directly. The board had already seen letters and comments from the developer days before the meeting. For the public, the first and last chance to express concerns was at this meeting.

By 5:30 p.m., the board announced that it would allow only 10 minutes for testimony about Jawbone Canyon. One person who had waited nearly four hours to speak was confined to one minute to express his concerns about wildlife in the Kelso Valley area. By placing an extreme time limit on the speakers, the supervisors removed any real dialogue.

Residents should have been able to voice their legitimate concerns about land use in Kern County for the next 100 or more years. Shockingly, the board unanimously rubber-stamped both projects.

The public would be far better served if our board would put controversial topics at the beginning of a meeting or call a special meeting with only one item on the agenda. We need to remember this disfranchisements of Kern residents when it comes to electing new supervisors. The public deserves to be heard.

Marjorie Bell


Source:  The Bakersfield Californian, www.bakersfield.com 1 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.