[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm industry is subsidised robbery  

Credit:  Western Daily Press, 28 September 2011 ~~

It is all very well Dale Vince, the founder of Ecotricity, slamming MP Neil Carmichael for double standards over his objecting to a wind farm proposal in Berkeley Vale, while hoping to build on on his land in Northumberland, but Mr Vince would do well to examine his own conscience regarding his hypocritical attitudes. On Ecotricity’s website he states: “We attribute our planning success in large part to our Good Neighbour policy through which we only commit to build turbines where we can be sure they will be good neighbours throughout their lifetime. If we can’t be sure, we walk away.”

The overwhelming majority of the neighbours to the proposed site he is attempting to develop in Berkeley Vale are against the turbines, but he still hasn’t walked away as he has promised to do. He doesn’t even have the courtesy (or the guts?) to come and talk to ‘the neighbours’. Instead, he conducts a phoney poll asking skewed questions to uninvolved people living miles away from the site – and then claims he has consulted the neighbours!

But these two wind advocates have much in common. They both stand to gain handsomely from an expensive, stuttering and unreliable technology, while talking up their supposed benefits to people who, increasingly, are no longer taken in. They are part of a “Robin hood in reverse” brigade, getting – or will be getting – huge sums from householders’ electricity bills (including those in fuel poverty) while trying to keep this iniquitous practice quietly to themselves, hoping it won’t be noticed.

If wind turbines were as efficient and cost-effective as the wind companies claim, they would be built without subsidies. However, not one single large wind turbine would be standing if it weren’t for these subsidies stolen from an unsuspecting public. With subsidies for wind turbines already being drastically curtailed in some cash-strapped countries and the occasional whisper that the same will soon happen here, Mr Vince must be wondering just how long he will be able to get away with his amazing good fortune.

The trouble is, with Mr Cameron’s father-in-law getting millions from his existing and future windfarms and Mrs Clegg on the board of one of the world’s largest renewable energy companies, there will be considerable resistance to any change to the flawed and discredited subsidy system.

It’s time the people who are making these opportunists even richer made their voice heard.

Roger Stroud
Stinchcombe, Gloucestershire

Source:  Western Daily Press, 28 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.